Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Revisiting Daubert: Judicial Gatekeeping and Expert Ethics in Court

10 references·2 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2000“Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct”4,251 cited
2015Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct.1,679 cited
2012Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology.447 cited
2020Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias332 cited
2013Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them?286 cited
1991Federal Rules of Evidence272 cited
2001Asking the gatekeepers: A national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world.252 cited
2019Psychological Assessments in Legal Contexts: Are Courts Keeping “Junk Science” Out of the Courtroom?97 cited
2020The adversarial mindset.33 cited
2018When expert decision making goes wrong: Consensus, bias, the role of experts, and accuracy.29 cited

Cited by

2025One hundred and ten fundamentals of performance validity tests in neuropsychological forensic disability and related assessment III: Core sources2 cited
2025Forensics: Methodological Challenges and Empirical Evidence2 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work