SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Methodological quality for systematic reviews of adverse events with surgical interventions: a cross-sectional survey
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Methodological quality for systematic reviews of adverse events with surgical interventions: a cross-sectional survey (2021)Methodological quality for systematic rev…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…What is an invasive procedure? A definition to inform study design, evidence synthesis and research tracking (2019)What is an invasive procedure…Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Updated guidance for trusted …The methodological quality of dose-response meta-analyses needed substantial improvement: a cross-sectional survey and proposed recommendations (2018)The methodological quality of…Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Meta-analysis and the science…Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality (2017)Systematic review adherence t…Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review (2017)Frequency of data extraction …AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…New evidence pyramid (2016)New evidence pyramidQuality of Conduct and Reporting of Meta-analyses of Surgical Interventions (2015)Quality of Conduct and Report…Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls (2014)Systematic reviews and meta-a…Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review (2014)Quality of reporting in syste…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2008)The Strengthening the Reporti…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement (2006)The Reporting of Randomized C…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Uncertainty in Treatment Rankings: Reanalysis of Network Meta-analyses of Randomized Trials (2016)Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random‐effects meta‐analysis (2018)Most published meta-regression analyses based on aggregate data suffer from methodological pitfalls: a meta-epidemiological study (2021)GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence (2011)MetaInsight: An interactive web‐based tool for analyzing, interrogating, and visualizing network meta‐analyses using R‐shiny and netmeta (2019)Systematic Literature Reviews: An Introduction (2019)The Handbook of Behavior Change (2020)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions (2020)Graduate Employability and Competence Development in Higher Education—A Systematic Literature Review Using PRISMA (2020)PRISMA 2020 statement: What's new and the importance of reporting guidelines (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress among populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: Advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (2017)Physical, psychological and occupational consequences of job burnout: A systematic review of prospective studies (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2008The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies17,743 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2019Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions7,170 cited
  • 2018Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis1,700 cited
  • 2016New evidence pyramid1,382 cited
  • 2017Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality322 cited
  • 2014Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls247 cited
  • 2017Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review229 cited
  • 2014Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review218 cited
  • 2006The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement140 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2019What is an invasive procedure? A definition to inform study design, evidence synthesis and research tracking111 cited
  • 2018The methodological quality of dose-response meta-analyses needed substantial improvement: a cross-sectional survey and proposed recommendations79 cited
  • 2015Quality of Conduct and Reporting of Meta-analyses of Surgical Interventions76 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.