Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Ten ways to improve academic CVs for fairer research assessment

10 references·7 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1968The Matthew Effect in Science6,700 cited
1968The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.4,791 cited
2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
2016The natural selection of bad science858 cited
2015The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management730 cited
2015The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management610 cited
2020The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity545 cited
2018Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure461 cited
2017Thinking with indicators. Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences145 cited
2014DORA: San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (May 2013)40 cited

Cited by

2023Little transparency and equity in scientific awards for early- and mid-career researchers in ecology and evolution14 cited
2022Time to rethink the scientific CV13 cited
2022Swiss funder unveils new CV format to make grant evaluation fairer9 cited
2022SciCV, the Swiss National Science Foundation’s new CV format8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2023Aggregate level research governance effects on particle physics: A comparative analysis7 cited

2022Research governance and the dynamics of science: A framework for the study of governance effects on research fields6 cited

2024A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture6 cited