Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

What parliamentarians think about Australia's post‐COVID‐19 aid program: The emerging ‘cautious consensus’ in Australian aid

11 references·2 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1993Agendas and instability in American politics5,981 cited
2007Foreign aid: diplomacy, development, domestic politics556 cited
2020Post-pandemic transformations: How and why COVID-19 requires us to rethink development481 cited
2012The Domestic Politics of Foreign Aid111 cited
2017Australia’s Foreign Aid Dilemma55 cited
2002Blazing the Trail: Eight Years of Change in Handling International Development24 cited
2016Australian aid after the ‘Golden Consensus’: from aid policy to development policy?16 cited
2017Gauging Change in Australian Aid: Stakeholder Perceptions of the Government Aid Program16 cited
2018Aid Policy and Australian Public Opinion15 cited
2018Donor policy domains in official development assistance: ideas, actors and rules in and beyond Asia9 cited
2021Global development cooperation in a COVID-19 world7 cited

Cited by

2022Analysis of Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors for the Aid Events of COVID-19 Based on GDELT3 cited
2025The Elite Paradigm Driving Australian Aid Policy: Learning to Live With the ‘Cautious Consensus’2 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work