SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Practical guide to undertaking scoping reviews for pharmacy clinicians, researchers and policymakers
16 references·1 citing·20 second hop
Practical guide to undertaking scoping reviews for pharmacy clinicians, researchers and policymakers (2021)Practical guide to undertaking scoping re…Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Updated methodological guidan…Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics (2021)Undertaking a scoping review:…Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidan…Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions (2020)Conducting high quality scopi…Chapter 11: Scoping reviews (2020)Chapter 11: Scoping reviewsWhat kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)What kind of systematic revie…The development of software to support multiple systematic review types (2018)The development of software t…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …An Evidence‐Based Approach to Scoping Reviews (2016)An Evidence‐Based Approach to…A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)A scoping review on the condu…Systematic Reviews (2014)Systematic ReviewsA scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)A scoping review of scoping r…Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…PRISMA Statement (2010)PRISMA StatementScoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Guidance on conducting methodological studies – an overview (2023)Guidance on conducting method…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols (2022)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews (2020)Understanding Eco-anxiety: A Systematic Scoping Review of Current Literature and Identified Knowledge Gaps (2021)Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review (2021)“How-to”: scoping review? (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,226 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2020Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews7,715 cited
  • 2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,074 cited
  • 2020Chapter 11: Scoping reviews2,536 cited
  • 2016A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews2,242 cited
  • 2021Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews1,448 cited
  • 2018What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences1,160 cited
  • 2018The development of software to support multiple systematic review types974 cited
  • 2021Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics766 cited
  • 2016An Evidence‐Based Approach to Scoping Reviews654 cited
  • 2010PRISMA Statement627 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2014
Systematic Reviews
520 cited
  • 2020Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions305 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Guidance on conducting methodological studies – an overview18 cited