SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice
16 references·8 citing·43 second hop
Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice (2021)Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of…The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)The evolving role of preprint…PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and e…Waste in covid-19 research (2020)Waste in covid-19 researchPRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and e…Coronavirus disease 2019: The harms of exaggerated information and non‐evidence‐based measures (2020)Coronavirus disease 2019: The…Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Searching for and selecting s…SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defini…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)A Comprehensive Survey of Ret…Science publishing: The trouble with retractions (2011)Science publishing: The troub…Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Retracted Science and the Ret…Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Retractions in the scientific…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research (2008)Enhancing the quality and tra…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Retraction of Clinical Trials about the SARS-CoV-2 Infection: An Unaddressed Problem and Its Possible Impact on Coronavirus Disease (COVID)-19 Treatment (2023)Retraction of Clinical Trials…Reducing the residue of retractions in evidence synthesis: ways to minimise inappropriate citation and use of retracted data (2023)Reducing the residue of retra…Poor visibility of retracted articles: a problem that should no longer be ignored (2023)Poor visibility of retracted …Determinants of peer review engagement and quality in scientific journals: insights for academic research and the sustainability of the peer-review system (2023)Determinants of peer review e…COVID-19 retracted publications on retraction watch: A systematic survey of their pre-prints and citations (2023)COVID-19 retracted publicatio…Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report (2022)Reducing the Inadvertent Spre…Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews: Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search Engines (2022)Improving the Reliability of …Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Biomedical Publications and Their Citation Frequency (2022)Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic o…Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Exploratory Research (2020)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (2006)PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)Musculoskeletal pain and sedentary behaviour in occupational and non-occupational settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (2021)Abstract screening using the automated tool Rayyan: results of effectiveness in three diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews (2022)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Reporting guidelines for Delphi techniques in health sciences: A methodological review (2022)The state of evidence for social and emotional learning: A contemporary meta-analysis of universal school-based SEL interventions (2023)Delphi studies in social and health sciences—Recommendations for an interdisciplinary standardized reporting (DELPHISTAR). Results of a Delphi study (2024)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2021PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews11,660 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials7,356 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2020PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews916 cited
  • 2019Searching for and selecting studies643 cited
  • 2021The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape556 cited
  • 2011Retracted Science and the Retraction Index405 cited
  • 2010Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?404 cited
  • 2020Coronavirus disease 2019: The harms of exaggerated information and non‐evidence‐based measures364 cited
  • 2012A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature355 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2008
Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research
332 cited
  • 2020Waste in covid-19 research330 cited
  • 2011Science publishing: The trouble with retractions328 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report39 cited
    • 2023Reducing the residue of retractions in evidence synthesis: ways to minimise inappropriate citation and use of retracted data28 cited
    • 2023Poor visibility of retracted articles: a problem that should no longer be ignored22 cited
    • 2022Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Biomedical Publications and Their Citation Frequency20 cited
    • 2023Determinants of peer review engagement and quality in scientific journals: insights for academic research and the sustainability of the peer-review system15 cited
    • 2022Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews: Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search Engines14 cited
    • 2023COVID-19 retracted publications on retraction watch: A systematic survey of their pre-prints and citations13 cited
    • 2023Retraction of Clinical Trials about the SARS-CoV-2 Infection: An Unaddressed Problem and Its Possible Impact on Coronavirus Disease (COVID)-19 Treatment9 cited