SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The efficacy of web or mobile-based interventions to alleviate emotional symptoms in people with advanced cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
16 references·0 citing·35 second hop
The efficacy of web or mobile-based interventions to alleviate emotional symptoms in people with advanced cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)The efficacy of web or mobile-based inter…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…Randomized Trial of a Tailored Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Mobile Application for Anxiety in Patients with Incurable Cancer (2019)Randomized Trial of a Tailore…Preliminary Results From a Randomized Controlled Study for an App-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program for Depression and Anxiety in Cancer Patients (2019)Preliminary Results From a Ra…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Web-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Distressed Cancer Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial (2018)Web-Delivered Cognitive Behav…Web-Based Stress Management for Newly Diagnosed Patients With Cancer (STREAM): A Randomized, Wait-List Controlled Intervention Study (2018)Web-Based Stress Management f…Standardized mean differences cause funnel plot distortion in publication bias assessments (2017)Standardized mean differences…Use of Theory in Behavior Change Interventions (2016)Use of Theory in Behavior Cha…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ (2015)Time to rethink the systemati…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Preferred reporting items for…RE: "SHOULD META-ANALYSES OF INTERVENTIONS INCLUDE OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES IN ADDITION TO RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS? A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES" (2009)RE: "SHOULD META-ANALYSES OF …Defining Internet-Supported Therapeutic Interventions (2009)Defining Internet-Supported T…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Should Meta-Analyses of Interventions Include Observational Studies in Addition to Randomized Controlled Trials? A Critical Examination of Underlying Principles (2007)Should Meta-Analyses of Inter…Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Quantifying heterogeneity in …Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies (2008)Bridging the Evidence Gap in Obesity Prevention: A Framework to Inform Decision Making (2010)The effectiveness of Multisystemic Therapy (MST): A meta-analysis (2014)Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial (2004)Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis (2006)A Comprehensive Review and a Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions (2008)A Behavior Change Model for Internet Interventions (2009)Internet-Delivered Psychological Treatments (2015)Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions in improving mental health: A review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2016)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Automatic imitation: A meta-analysis. (2018)The Caregiver Health Effects of Caring for Young Children with Developmental Disabilities: A Meta-analysis (2020)The Perils of Misinterpreting and Misusing “Publication Bias” in Meta-analyses: An Education Review on Funnel Plot-Based Methods (2023)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2010Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement12,147 cited
  • 2009Defining Internet-Supported Therapeutic Interventions730 cited
  • 2007Should Meta-Analyses of Interventions Include Observational Studies in Addition to Randomized Controlled Trials? A Critical Examination of Underlying Principles493 cited
  • 2009RE: "SHOULD META-ANALYSES OF INTERVENTIONS INCLUDE OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES IN ADDITION TO RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS? A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES"375 cited
  • 2017Standardized mean differences cause funnel plot distortion in publication bias assessments213 cited
  • 2015Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’161 cited
  • 2016Use of Theory in Behavior Change Interventions148 cited
  • 2019Randomized Trial of a Tailored Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Mobile Application for Anxiety in Patients with Incurable Cancer112 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2018
Web-Based Stress Management for Newly Diagnosed Patients With Cancer (STREAM): A Randomized, Wait-List Controlled Intervention Study
98 cited
  • 2018Web-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Distressed Cancer Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial74 cited
  • 2019Preliminary Results From a Randomized Controlled Study for an App-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program for Depression and Anxiety in Cancer Patients61 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.