SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evidence-based research impact praxis: Integrating scholarship and practice to ensure research benefits society
16 references·0 citing·46 second hop
Evidence-based research impact praxis: Integrating scholarship and practice to ensure research benefits society (2021)Evidence-based research impact praxis: In…Is this what success looks like? Mismatches between the aims, claims, and evidence used to demonstrate impact from knowledge exchange processes at the interface of environmental science and policy (2021)Is this what success looks li…Evaluating impact from research: A methodological framework (2021)Evaluating impact from resear…Research governance and the future(s) of research assessment (2019)Research governance and the f…Expanding the role of social science in conservation through an engagement with philosophy, methodology, and methods (2019)Expanding the role of social …The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The state of OA: a large-scal…The politics of research impact: academic perceptions of the implications for research funding, motivation and quality (2018)The politics of research impa…Preaching to the scientifically converted: evaluating inclusivity in science festival audiences (2017)Preaching to the scientifical…Limits to responsible innovation (2016)Limits to responsible innovat…Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach (2014)Integrating Qualitative and Q…Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: A critical assessment of trade-offs in science-policy interfaces (2013)Balancing credibility, releva…Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Measuring the Prevalence of Q…Evaluating the demand side: New challenges for evaluation (2012)Evaluating the demand side: N…The Production and Dissemination of Knowledge: A Scoping Review of Arts-Based Health Research (2011)The Production and Disseminat…Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained (2007)Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism…Participation: the New Tyranny? (2001)Participation: the New Tyrann…Who Counts Reality? Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation: A Literature Review (1998)Who Counts Reality? Participa…Science for the post-normal age (1993)Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (2003)Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming (2011)Adding ‘iterativity’ to the credibility, relevance, legitimacy: A novel scheme to highlight dynamic aspects of science–policy interfaces (2015)Conceptualizing credibility, relevance and legitimacy for evaluating the effectiveness of science–policy interfaces: Challenges and opportunities (2015)An introduction to achieving policy impact for early career researchers (2018)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science (2012)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. (2005)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)A matter of taste: evaluating the quality of qualitative research (2014)Embodied Ways of Storying the Self: A Systematic Review of Body-Mapping (2015)Researchers under the spell of the arts: Two decades of using arts-based methods in community-based inquiry with vulnerable populations (2017)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)The Practice of Social Research (1989)Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. (1998)Doing Mixed Methods Research Pragmatically: Implications for the Rediscovery of Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm (2009)Pragmatism as a Paradigm for Social Research (2014)Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (1994)Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2009)Four Common Problems In Environmental Social Research Undertaken by Natural Scientists (2019)Nature documentaries and saving nature: Reflections on the new Netflix series Our Planet (2019)Re-thinking research impact: voice, context and power at the interface of science, policy and practice (2022)Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation (2002)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Towards an integrated framework for evaluating transformative innovation policy (2022)“Real impact”: Challenges and opportunities in bridging the gap between research and practice – Making a difference in industry, policy, and society (2024)Reframing Public Policy (2003)Community-Based and -Driven Development: A Critical Review (2004)Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation (2012)Stakeholder excellence? Framing the evolution and complexity of a stakeholder perspective of the firm (2002)Analyzing social capital in context : a guide to using qualitative methods and data (2006)Arguments for a Common Set of Principles for Collaborative Inquiry in Evaluation (2013)Searching for an optimal balance: Dual career experiences of Swedish adolescent athletes (2014)Three principles of pragmatism for research on organizational processes (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001Participation: the New Tyranny?4,566 cited
  • 2007Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained2,517 cited
  • 2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,240 cited
  • 2018The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles1,217 cited
  • 2014Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach616 cited
  • 2021Evaluating impact from research: A methodological framework321 cited
  • 2011The Production and Dissemination of Knowledge: A Scoping Review of Arts-Based Health Research264 cited
  • 2013Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: A critical assessment of trade-offs in science-policy interfaces234 cited
  • 1998Who Counts Reality? Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation: A Literature Review197 cited
  • 2019Expanding the role of social science in conservation through an engagement with philosophy, methodology, and methods153 cited
  • 2016Limits to responsible innovation129 cited
  • 2019Research governance and the future(s) of research assessment109 cited
  • 2017Preaching to the scientifically converted: evaluating inclusivity in science festival audiences102 cited
  • 2012Evaluating the demand side: New challenges for evaluation102 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2021Is this what success looks like? Mismatches between the aims, claims, and evidence used to demonstrate impact from knowledge exchange processes at the interface of environmental science and policy99 cited
  • 2018The politics of research impact: academic perceptions of the implications for research funding, motivation and quality98 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.