SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Appraising clinical applicability of studies: mapping and synthesis of current frameworks, and proposal of the FrACAS framework and VICORT checklist
16 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Appraising clinical applicability of studies: mapping and synthesis of current frameworks, and proposal of the FrACAS framework and VICORT checklist (2021)Appraising clinical applicability of stud…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…The Proposal to Lower P Value Thresholds to .005 (2018)The Proposal to Lower P Value…PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Ris…Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)Assessing the Risk of Bias of…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (N…Decision Making in Health and Medicine (2014)Decision Making in Health and…Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide (2011)Measurement in Medicine: A Pr…Measurement in Medicine (2011)Measurement in MedicineGRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating t…Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005)Methods for the Economic Eval…Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values (2001)Decision Making in Health and…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (1994)Research Design: Qualitative,…Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. (1957)Factors relevant to the valid…Interpretation of Educational Measurements (1928)Interpretation of Educational…External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice (2020)Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence (2021)PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods (2025)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives (1999)The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 (2002)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses (2016)Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice (2005)Case study research: design and methods (2011)Exploring the credibility of online celebrities' Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users (2016)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)Getting serious about test–retest reliability: a critique of retest research and some recommendations (2014)COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study (2018)Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches35,275 cited
  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 2014The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses17,633 cited
  • 2005Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes13,647 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 2011Measurement in Medicine2,318 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness1,838 cited
  • 2018PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration1,663 cited
  • 2011Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide1,209 cited
  • 1957Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings.1,143 cited
  • 1928Interpretation of Educational Measurements877 cited
  • 2018The Proposal to Lower P Value Thresholds to .005654 cited
  • 2001Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values654 cited
  • 2017Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

448 cited
  • 2014Decision Making in Health and Medicine426 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.