SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Health sciences librarians’ engagement in open science: a scoping review
16 references·0 citing·32 second hop
Health sciences librarians’ engagement in open science: a scoping review (2021)Health sciences librarians’ engagement in…PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the…Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidan…Open Science Isn't Always Open to All Scientists (2019)Open Science Isn't Always Ope…Chapter 11: Scoping reviews (2019)Chapter 11: Scoping reviewsPRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition (2018)Open Science now: A systemati…Why Medical Schools Should Embrace Wikipedia: Final-Year Medical Student Contributions to Wikipedia Articles for Academic Credit at One School (2016)Why Medical Schools Should Em…The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The academic, economic and so…The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The academic, economic and so…PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)A scoping review on the condu…When will ‘open science’ become simply ‘science’? (2015)When will ‘open science’ beco…Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Methods for the thematic synt…Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Using thematic analysis in ps…Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. (2006)Open access: implications for…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place (2015)Thematic Analysis (2017)Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis (2019)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review (2014)The role of masculinity in men's help-seeking for depression: A systematic review (2016)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols (2022)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Toward a new economics of science (1994)Open innovation : researching a new paradigm (2006)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)Fake news, social media and marketing: A systematic review (2020)The Future of Sensitivity Analysis: An essential discipline for systems modeling and policy support (2020)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods (2019)Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Using thematic analysis in psychology193,725 cited
  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2008Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews9,266 cited
  • 2020Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews7,715 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 2021PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews3,654 cited
  • 2016A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews2,242 cited
  • 2019Chapter 11: Scoping reviews2,217 cited
  • 2018Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition709 cited
  • 2016The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review559 cited
  • 2016The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review182 cited
  • 2006Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries.116 cited
  • 2016Why Medical Schools Should Embrace Wikipedia: Final-Year Medical Student Contributions to Wikipedia Articles for Academic Credit at One School97 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2019Open Science Isn't Always Open to All Scientists96 cited
  • 2015When will ‘open science’ become simply ‘science’?90 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.