References

• 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
• 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
• 2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research1,465 cited
• 2005Scientists behaving badly1,089 cited
• 2014Reproducibility in Science1,031 cited
• 2015The fickle P value generates irreproducible results766 cited
• 2006Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions407 cited
• 2016Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015370 cited
• 2018Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure225 cited
• 2008Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols201 cited
• 2020Recommendations to enhance rigor and reproducibility in biomedical research154 cited
• 2019The False Positive Risk: A Proposal Concerning What to Do About p -Values134 cited
• 2021The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable88 cited
• 2019Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability81 cited