Coso Rock Art Within Its Archaeological Context

Amy J. Gilreath · William R. Hildebrandt

16 citations0/0 files storedeScholarship (California Digital Library)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Archaeology and Rock Art Studies Archaeology and ancient environmental studies Archaeological and Geological Studies

Abstract

Prehistoric rock art is a most obvious part of the archaeological record, yet some interpretative models increasingly distance this art from its archaeological context This is particularly true for the Coso rock art area, which has emerged as a "type locality" for a shamanic approach to rock art interpretation. The fundamental thesis of the current paper is that the meaning and antiquity of prehistoric rock art are best understood by placing the art within its contemporaneous archaeological context using routine analytical methods. We advocate a return to the archaeological approach of interpreting rock art and argue against the perpetuation of increasingly complex and confounding "explanations " based on untestable hypotheses extrapolated from ethnographic data with questionable linkages to the archaeological record. Reviews of local and regional chronological data, settlement patterns, and subsistence practices indicate that the production of Coso rock art tracked closely with the rise and fall of bighorn sheep hunting in the southwestern Great Basin. During the Newberry period (3,500-1,350 cal B.P.), when darts and atlatls provided the main technology, the hunting of bighorn sheep was a major component of the adaptation. When the bow and arrow were adopted during the Haiwee period (1,350 650 cal B.P.), hunting efficiency increased and ultimately contributed to the depletion of sheep throughout the region. We conclude that the proliferation of bighorn sheep petroglyphs during the Haiwee period reflects a unique local response to a regional problem. Responding to the over exploitation of a key food resource—bighorn sheep—local groups intensified their ritualistic practices, and did so in a way that vividly marked their territory and signaled their distinctiveness from neighboring groups in California and in other parts of the Great Basin.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 16 citations exist upstream.

References

1938Basin-plateau aboriginal sociopolitical groups 1983Hunter-Gatherer Mobility Strategies 1986Technological Organization and Settlement Mobility: An Ethnographic Examination 1992Hunter-Gatherers: Archaeological and Evolutionary Theory. By Robert L. Bettinger.2001Proto‐Uto‐Aztecan: A Community of Cultivators in Central Mexico?1989On Tool-Class Use Lives and the Formation of Archaeological Assemblages 2002The Ascendance of Hunting during the California Middle Archaic: An Evolutionary Perspective 1993Health in Prehistoric Populations of the Santa Barbara Channel Islands

Cited by

2012Distinguishing Between Darts and Arrows in the Archaeological Record: Implications for Technological Change in the American West 2009Myth, Ritual and Rock Art: Coso Decorated Animal-humans and the Animal Master 2018Obsidian studies in California archaeology 2011Reproductive Symbolism in Great Basin Rock Art: Bighorn Sheep Hunting, Fertility and Forager Ideology 2016Digital technologies and quantitative approaches to recording rock art in the Great Basin, USA

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.