SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Are Important Weights Sensitive to the Range of Alternatives in Multiattribute Utility Measurement
0 references·11 citing·43 second hop
Are Important Weights Sensitive to the Range of Alternatives in Multiattribute Utility Measurement (1978)Are Important Weights Sensitive to the Ra…Behavioral Decision Research: Descriptive and Prescriptive Perspectives (2024)Behavioral Decision Research:…Analyzing anchoring bias in attribute weight elicitation of SMART, Swing, and best‐worst method (2022)Analyzing anchoring bias in a…Equalizing bias in eliciting attribute weights in multiattribute decision‐making: experimental research (2021)Equalizing bias in eliciting …Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for evaluating new medicines in Health Technology Assessment and beyond: The Advance Value Framework (2017)Multiple Criteria Decision An…Biases and Debiasing in Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (2015)Biases and Debiasing in Multi…The benefits of global scaling in multi-criteria decision analysis (2009)The benefits of global scalin…Overcoming barriers to priority setting using interdisciplinary methods (2009)Overcoming barriers to priori…Priority setting in health care using multi-attribute utility theory and programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) (2006)Priority setting in health ca…An approach to using the analytic hierarchy process for solving multiple criteria decision making problems (1994)An approach to using the anal…Comparing Hierarchical and Nonhierarchical Weighting Methods for Eliciting Multiattribute Value Models (1987)Comparing Hierarchical and No…THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS AND THE ADDITIVE VALUE FUNCTION* (1982)THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE …Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk (1988)A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures (1977)Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions (1979)Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (1980)AHP DESIGN ISSUES FOR LARGE‐SCALE SYSTEMS (1987)Comparing multiple criteria decision methods to extend a geographical information system on afforestation (2005)A Comprehensive Literature Review of the Rank Reversal Phenomenon in the Analytic Hierarchy Process (2012)Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. (1951)Multi-criteria decision analysis to prioritize health interventions: Capitalizing on first experiences (2010)Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry (2010)‘Real-world’ health care priority setting using explicit decision criteria: a systematic review of the literature (2015)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Criteria for the procedural fairness of health financing decisions: a scoping review (2023)Decisions with Multiple Objectives (1993)Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (1996)Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (1996)Stakeholder involvement in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (2018)Measuring the efficiency of decision making units (1978)The analytic hierarchy process : planning, priority setting, resource allocation (1980)Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. (1994)Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment (1971)Decision analysis and behavioral research (1986)Behavioral and procedural consequences of structural variation in value trees (2001)The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in the integrated assessment of climate change: implications for IA practitioners (2003)A Value Model for Evaluating Homeland Security Decisions (2011)Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach (2001)The decision task complexity and information acquisition strategies in GIS-MCDA (2014)Participatory Modeling and Structured Decision Making (2016)Recommendations for online elicitation of swing weights from citizens in environmental decision-making (2020)Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Barriers for Access to New Medicines: Searching for the Balance Between Rising Costs and Limited Budgets (2018)Multi-criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment: addressing methodological challenges to improve the state of the art (2019)Assessment and prioritization of the WHO “best buys” and other recommended interventions for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases in Iran (2020)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Better decisions with less cognitive load: The Parsimonious BWM (2024)Intertemporal Judgements in Multi‐Attribute Decision‐Making: Biases and Mitigation Ideas (2026)Communication and Persuasion (1986)Analysis of the fire risks and mitigation approaches in the apparel manufacturing industry: Implications toward operational safety and sustainability (2023)Cognitive Bias Mitigation in Executive Decision-Making: A Data-Driven Approach Integrating Big Data Analytics, AI, and Explainable Systems (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2017Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for evaluating new medicines in Health Technology Assessment and beyond: The Advance Value Framework213 cited
  • 1987Comparing Hierarchical and Nonhierarchical Weighting Methods for Eliciting Multiattribute Value Models146 cited
  • 1982THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS AND THE ADDITIVE VALUE FUNCTION*116 cited
  • 2009Overcoming barriers to priority setting using interdisciplinary methods92 cited
  • 2006Priority setting in health care using multi-attribute utility theory and programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA)71 cited
  • 2021Equalizing bias in eliciting attribute weights in multiattribute decision‐making: experimental research64 cited
  • 2022Analyzing anchoring bias in attribute weight elicitation of SMART, Swing, and best‐worst method49 cited
  • 2009The benefits of global scaling in multi-criteria decision analysis43 cited
  • 1994An approach to using the analytic hierarchy process for solving multiple criteria decision making problems37 cited
  • 2015Biases and Debiasing in Multi-criteria Decision Analysis34 cited
  • 2024Behavioral Decision Research: Descriptive and Prescriptive Perspectives3 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work