‘Ergative’ Marking in Tibeto-Burman

Randy J. LaPolla

65 citations0/0 files storedPublication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation Linguistics and language evolution Linguistics and Cultural Studies

Abstract

There is some commonality within Kiranti, though the Limbu, Yakha, Sunwar, and Thulung forms do not seem to fit with the other Kiranti forms.For Proto-Kiranti we will tentatively reconstruct *a.Following are the other relevant case markers:

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 65 citations exist upstream.

References

1991On some principles of grammaticization 1985Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax 1955Classification of the Sino-Tibetan Languages 1993A Historical-comparative Study of the Tani (Mirish) Branch in Tibeto-Burman

Cited by

2018Revisiting the anasynthetic spiral 2015A grammar of Yakkha 2018Grammaticalization in the North Caucasian languages 2010Language Contact and Language Change in the History of the Sinitic Languages 2018Grammaticalization processes in the languages of South Asia 2018Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective 2022Iconicity as Multimodal, Polysemiotic, and Plurifunctional 2016Once again on methodology and argumentation in linguistics

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.