THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO EMOTION

Abstract

Four major theoretical perspectives on emotion in psychology are described. Examples of the ways in which research on emotion and speech utilize aspects of the various perspectives are presented and plea is made for students of emotion and speech consider more self-consciously the place of their research within each of the perspectives. 1. ARE THEORIES OF EMOTION NECESSARY? Fifty years ago, B. F. Skinner (Skinner, 1950; Skinner, 1972) asked Are theories of learning necessary? Calling theories, especially those that traffic in intervening variables or that appeal to events taking place somewhere else, at some other level of observation, described in different terms and measured, if at all, in different dimensions (Skinner, 1972, p. 69) from the phenomena they seek explain, fun but useless, Skinner argued that theories of learning are ultimately a refuge from the data (Skinner, 1972, p. 72) and so should be abandoned by any self-respecting science of behavior. I would like ask the same question of theories of emotion; namely, Are theories of emotion necessary? More specifically, I would like ask, Are theories of emotion necessary--and useful--to students of emotion and speech? Although it is beyond the scope of this paper, I believe it can be shown that Skinner's attack on theory was wrongheaded and that his conviction that scientific psychology could make do without theories and just back an observable datum (p. 72) was belied by his own arguments, which are saturated by the kind of theoretical statements which he objected. Contra Skinner, I will argue that theories of emotion are absolutely essential for students of emotion, no matter what aspect of emotion they study. I will further argue that both contemporary and classic theories of emotion are eminently useful students of emotion and speech. I know that you all make reference in your work very specific theories of emotion gets encoded into speech and the like. I would like convince you of the centrality and usefulness of the big theories of emotion your research. To get there, I will first describe four of the most influential theoretical perspectives and research traditions in the study of emotion in the past 125 years or so. I will then briefly describe what I see as some of the ways in which the four perspectives have begun converge. Next, I will attempt locate some examples of the research presented at this conference within the four perspectives. This will give you sense, I hope, of the ways in which students of emotion and speech already make use of the big theories of emotion, if sometimes only implicitly. Finally, I will outline what students of emotion and speech might gain from an integration of theories from the four perspectives. 2. FOUR THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES When Skinner (Skinner, 1950) talked about theories of learning, he was actually talking about families or kinds of theories. I shall for the most part be doing the same. A survey of contemporary theory and research on emotion in psychology reveals four different general theoretical perspectives about define, study, and explain emotion. I have called these the Darwinian, Jamesian, cognitive, and social constructivist perspectives (Cornelius, 1996) . Each of these perspectives has its own set of assumptions about the nature of emotion, about construct theories about emotion, and about conduct research on emotion. Each perspective is also associated with it own body of empirical research. Because each of the perspectives has its own more or less unique way of thinking about emotions, has endured in time, and has its sometimes passionate cadre of adherents whose research exemplifies how things are done within the perspective, it is appropriate speak about each perspective as embodying its own tradition of research. There are, of course, several areas of overlap among the four perspectives and their associated research traditions, this is especially true of the Darwinian and Jamesian perspectives. However, for the most part, each ultimately presents quite different account of what emotions are all about. 2.1 The Darwinian Perspective The central organizing idea of the Darwinian perspective is the notion that emotions are evolved phenomena with important survival functions that have been selected for because they have solved certain problems we have faced as species. As such, we should see the same emotions, more or less, in all humans. In addition, since humans share an evolutionary past with other mammals, we should expect observe similarities in the emotions of closely-related species. The Darwinian perspective and its associated tradition of research had their beginnings in Darwin's 1872 book The Expression of Emotion in Man and Animals. The book, whose origin lay in Darwin's discomfort with earlier attempts explain emotional expressions in terms of special creation, described in Darwin's typically marvelous attention detail the facial expressions and bodily movements that accompany several emotions in humans and other animals and presented ISCA Archive

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 116 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.