On the Costs of Inflation and Unemployment

Imad A. Moosa

14 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Post Keynesian Economics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Monetary Policy and Economic Impact Economic Theory and Policy Unemployment and Economic Growth

Abstract

The costs of inflation and unemployment and the related issue of Enemy Number have been a popular topic in the press, particularly in the rhetoric of politicians and central bankers. Rightwing politicians (echoed by supposedly independent central bankers) and journalists have been telling the public that inflation is Public Enemy Number One, and therefore it must be fought to the last drop of blood. Academic economists have also engaged in this debate by presenting theories and econometric estimates of the costs of inflation and unemployment with an obvious dichotomy. Those economists who endorse the proposition that inflation is Public Enemy Number One produce evidence on the costs of inflation. On the other hand, economists who reject this proposition produce evidence on the costs of unemployment. The latter would then compare their results with those of the former to prove their point, although the two sets of results may be based on different countries, sample periods, and methodologies. The objective of this paper is to reexamine this issue and to present some evidence on the costs of inflation and unemployment in terms of their effect on output, using one model applied to the same country (the United States) over a very long period (1890-1987). For this purpose, the structural time-series approach proposed by Harvey (1985, 1989) is used to test the relationship between output, on the one hand, and inflation and unemployment, on the other. One advantage of this approach is that there is implicit adjustment for cyclicality in the underlying variables which, in previous studies, proved to be problematical in the sense that spurious results may be obtained if no adjustment is made to take account of cyclical behavior.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 14 citations exist upstream.

References

1990Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter 1979Potential GNP: Its measurement and significance 1985Trends and Cycles in Macroeconomic Time Series 20034 Inflation and economic growth 1997A Cross-Country Comparison of Okun's Coefficient 1996Stamp 5.0 Structural Time Series Analyser, Modeller and Predictor.1978The Costs of Inflation 1988An international comparison of Okun's laws

Cited by

2012Regional Growth and Unemployment: The Validity of Okun's Law for the Finnish Regions

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.