SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Environmental and contextual factors influencing e-health use among older adults: A rapid review
16 references·0 citing·48 second hop
Environmental and contextual factors influencing e-health use among older adults: A rapid review (2024)Environmental and contextual factors infl…Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process (2022)Revising the JBI quantitative…Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review (2021)Barriers and facilitators to …The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline (2020)Synthesis without meta-analys…Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews (2020)Methodological guidance for t…e-Health interventions for healthy aging: a systematic review (2020)e-Health interventions for he…Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews (2020)Defining Rapid Reviews: a sys…The value of a second reviewer for study selection in systematic reviews (2019)The value of a second reviewe…Facilitators of and Barriers to mHealth Adoption in Older Adults With Heart Failure (2018)Facilitators of and Barriers …A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches (2018)A systematic approach to sear…Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study (2017)Optimal database combinations…The use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: a systematic literature review (2016)The use of e-health and m-hea…What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services (2015)What is quality in assisted l…The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)The Role of Google Scholar in…A New Research Challenge: Persuasive Technology to Motivate Healthy Aging (2004)A New Research Challenge: Per…Food Safety Issues, Trade and WTO Rules: A Developing Country Perspective (2003)Food Safety Issues, Trade and…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review (2019)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. (2002)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Relationship Between Perceived Risks of Using mHealth Applications and the Intention to Use Them Among Older Adults in the Netherlands: Cross-sectional Study (2021)Towards digital health equity - a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by vulnerable groups in using digital health services in the COVID-19 era (2022)Digital Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older People: Scoping Review (2023)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research (2019)The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research (2020)What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0 (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods (2005)Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach (2014)Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool ( MMAT ) (2018)Police Exposures and the Health and Well-being of Black Youth in the US (2021)GP wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review (2022)JBI series paper 2: tailored evidence synthesis approaches are required to answer diverse questions: a pragmatic evidence synthesis toolkit from JBI (2022)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Psychiatric and medical comorbidities of eating disorders: findings from a rapid review of the literature (2022)Risk factors for eating disorders: findings from a rapid review (2023)Updated recommendations for the Cochrane rapid review methods guidance for rapid reviews of effectiveness (2024)User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1 (2003)Barriers and facilitators to health technology adoption by older adults with chronic diseases: an integrative systematic review (2024)Factors influencing digital health literacy among older adults: a scoping review (2024)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Efficacy of Progressive Muscle Relaxation in Adults for Stress, Anxiety, and Depression: A Systematic Review (2024)The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for cohort studies (2024)The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for analytical cross-sectional studies (2025)Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance (2021)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2nd edition (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews8,068 cited
  • 2020Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline4,561 cited
  • 2015The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching2,381 cited
  • 2017Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study2,104 cited
  • 2018A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches861 cited
  • 2020Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews712 cited
  • 2021Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review703 cited
  • 2022Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process466 cited
  • 2020Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews384 cited
  • 2016The use of e-health and m-health tools in health promotion and primary prevention among older adults: a systematic literature review327 cited
  • 2019The value of a second reviewer for study selection in systematic reviews300 cited
  • 2018Facilitators of and Barriers to mHealth Adoption in Older Adults With Heart Failure208 cited
  • 2004A New Research Challenge: Persuasive Technology to Motivate Healthy Aging

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

186 cited
  • 2015What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services181 cited
  • 2003Food Safety Issues, Trade and WTO Rules: A Developing Country Perspective161 cited
  • 2020e-Health interventions for healthy aging: a systematic review153 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.