SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluating the Admissibility of New Genetic Identification Tests: Lessons from the "DNA War"
0 references·5 citing·27 second hop
Evaluating the Admissibility of New Genetic Identification Tests: Lessons from the "DNA War" (1993)Evaluating the Admissibility of New Genet…Psychological Aspects of Forensic Identification Evidence (2020)Psychological Aspects of Fore…How do latent print examiners perceive proficiency testing? An analysis of examiner perceptions, performance, and print quality (2019)How do latent print examiners…Renegotiating forensic cultures: Between law, science and criminal justice (2012)Renegotiating forensic cultur…Scientific Evidence in Europe -- Admissibility, Evaluation and Equality of Arms (2011)Scientific Evidence in Europe…The relationship between forensic science and judicial error: a study covering error sources, bias, and remedies (2009)The relationship between fore…Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment (1971)Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980 (1982)The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence (1992)Explaining the Tension between the Supreme Court's Embrace of Validity as the Touchstone of Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Lower Courts' (Seeming) Rejection of Same (2008)Does contextual information bias bitemark comparisons? (2014)Crime reconstruction and the role of trace materials from crime scene to court (2019)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Knowledge in a Social World (1999)States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order (2004)Forensic DNA databases in England and the Netherlands: governance, structure and performance compared (2012)Paradigms of forensic science and legal process: a critical diagnosis (2015)The Long Arm of the Algorithm? Automated Facial Recognition as Evidence and Trigger for Police Intervention (2019)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (2004)Modern scientific evidence : the law and science of expert testimony (2006)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Admissibility and appraisal of scientific evidence in continental European criminal justice systems: past, present and future (2013)OUP accepted manuscript (2017)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Common Sense (1984)Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (2004)Forensic Science and the Paradigm of Quality (2013)Appraisal of scientific evidence in criminal justice systems: on winds of change and coexisting formats (2014)Scientific validation of fingerprint evidence under Daubert (2007)Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions (2011)Repeatability and Reproducibility of Decisions by Latent Fingerprint Examiners (2012)Latent Print Proficiency Testing: An Examination of Test Respondents, Test‐Taking Procedures, and Test Characteristics (2019)Latent print quality in blind proficiency testing: Using quality metrics to examine laboratory performance (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2011Scientific Evidence in Europe -- Admissibility, Evaluation and Equality of Arms34 cited
  • 2012Renegotiating forensic cultures: Between law, science and criminal justice33 cited
  • 2020Psychological Aspects of Forensic Identification Evidence33 cited
  • 2019How do latent print examiners perceive proficiency testing? An analysis of examiner perceptions, performance, and print quality16 cited
  • 2009The relationship between forensic science and judicial error: a study covering error sources, bias, and remedies12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work