SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Journals in Beall's list perform as a group less well than other open access journals indexed in Scopus but reveal large differences among publishers
16 references·2 citing·44 second hop
Journals in Beall's list perform as a group less well than other open access journals indexed in Scopus but reveal large differences among publishers (2021)Journals in Beall's list perform as a gro…RETRACTED ARTICLE: Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences (2021)RETRACTED ARTICLE: Predatory …Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Journal citation reports and …How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall's lists of predatory journals on academic publishing (2020)How is open access accused of…How Frequently Are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited (2020)How Frequently Are Articles i…The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects (2019)The Journal Impact Factor: A …Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators (2019)Springer Handbook of Science …Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Predatory journals: no defini…Perspectives From Authors and Editors in the Biomedical Disciplines on Predatory Journals: Survey Study (2019)Perspectives From Authors and…Citations of articles in predatory nursing journals (2019)Citations of articles in pred…Economists behaving badly: publications in predatory journals (2018)Economists behaving badly: pu…Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers (2017)Are predatory journals underm…Applied Evaluative Informetrics (2017)Applied Evaluative Informetri…Presence of alleged predatory journals in bibliographic databases: Analysis of Beall’s list (2016)Presence of alleged predatory…‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)‘Predatory’ open access: a lo…Who publishes in “predatory” journals? (2014)Who publishes in “predatory” …Is the impact of journal impact factors decreasing? (2008)Is the impact of journal impa…A structured literature review of empirical research on mandatory auditor rotation (2024)A structured literature revie…The Classification of Q1 SJR-Ranked Library and Information Science Journals by an AI-driven “Suspected Predatory” Journal Classifier (2023)The Classification of Q1 SJR-…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Bias in peer review (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Predatory journals recruit fake editor (2017)Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions (2017)Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Is Predatory Publishing a Real Threat? Evidence from a Large Database Study (2017)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification (1972)Econometric policy evaluation: A critique (1976)Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)The Bibliometric Literature on Scopus and WoS: The Medicine and Environmental Sciences Categories as Case of Study (2021)Reproducibility in machine‐learning‐based research: Overview, barriers, and drivers (2025)Geography and Economic Development (1998)Notes on CEPII’s Distances Measures: The GeoDist Database (2012)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2021)Predatory journals and publishers: Characteristics and impact of academic spam to researchers in educational sciences (2022)Predatory publishing in Scopus: Evidence on cross-country differences (2022)Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (2002)Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming (2011)Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process (2022)Cabells' Predatory Reports criteria: Assessment and proposed revisions (2023)Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (1988)Communities of practice learning, meaning, and identity (1999)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Why don't we see more action? A metasynthesis of the investor impediments to integrate environmental, social, and governance factors (2019)Gender-based homophily in research: A large-scale study of man-woman collaboration (2021)Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) and artificial intelligence in finance: State-of-the-art and research takeaways (2024)Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature (2018)Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science (2018)Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF) (2019)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)A bibliometric analysis of Research on Education 4.0 during the 2017–2021 period (2022)A comprehensive review of circular economy research in the textile and clothing industry (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics818 cited
  • 2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence725 cited
  • 2014Who publishes in “predatory” journals?360 cited
  • 2019Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators299 cited
  • 2019The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects249 cited
  • 2021Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)172 cited
  • 2017Applied Evaluative Informetrics153 cited
  • 2020How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall's lists of predatory journals on academic publishing128 cited
  • 2017Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers119 cited
  • 2021RETRACTED ARTICLE: Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences82 cited
  • 2020How Frequently Are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited77 cited
  • 2008Is the impact of journal impact factors decreasing?72 cited
  • 2018Economists behaving badly: publications in predatory journals53 cited
  • 2016Presence of alleged predatory journals in bibliographic databases: Analysis of Beall’s list52 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2019Perspectives From Authors and Editors in the Biomedical Disciplines on Predatory Journals: Survey Study48 cited
  • 2019Citations of articles in predatory nursing journals42 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024A structured literature review of empirical research on mandatory auditor rotation24 cited
    • 2023The Classification of Q1 SJR-Ranked Library and Information Science Journals by an AI-driven “Suspected Predatory” Journal Classifier11 cited