SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Violation of research integrity principles occurs more often than we think
8 references·1 citing·35 second hop
Violation of research integrity principles occurs more often than we think (2021)Violation of research integrity principle…When beauty is but skin deep: dealing with problematic studies in systematic reviews (2021)When beauty is but skin deep:…The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable (2021)The lesson of ivermectin: met…Assessing Research Misconduct in Randomized Controlled Trials (2021)Assessing Research Misconduct…False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia (2020)False individual patient data…Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology (2019)Plagiarism and data falsifica…What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing's ‘death penalty' (2018)What a massive database of re…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Repairing research integrity (2008)Repairing research integrityPreventing fraud in biomedical research (2022)Preventing fraud in biomedica…Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research (2001)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? (2010)Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science (2021)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity (2012)Hundreds of thousands of zombie randomised trials circulate among us (2020)Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis (2022)Medicine is plagued by untrustworthy clinical trials. How many studies are faked or flawed? (2023)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Data integrity of 35 randomised controlled trials in women’ health (2020)Retracted publications and their citation in dental literature: A systematic review (2020)Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers (2021)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Searching for and selecting studies (2023)The Individual Participant Data Integrity Tool for assessing the integrity of randomised trials (2024)Assessing the feasibility and impact of clinical trial trustworthiness checks via an application to Cochrane Reviews: Stage 2 of the INSPECT-SR project (2025)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Fifty Years of Retracted Medical Publications From 1975 to 2024: A Comprehensive Analysis of Trends, Reasons, and Countries Using the Retraction Watch Database (2025)Fake science and the knowledge crisis: ignorance can be fatal (2019)The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019 (2019)Peer Review Matters: Research Quality and the Public Trust (2020)Integrity of randomized clinical trials: Performance of integrity tests and checklists requires assessment (2023)Research Integrity in Guidelines and evIDence synthesis (RIGID): a framework for assessing research integrity in guideline development and evidence synthesis (2024)Why and how we should join the shift from significance testing to estimation (2022)Protocol for the development of a tool (INSPECT-SR) to identify problematic randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of health interventions (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2008Repairing research integrity300 cited
  • 2020False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia172 cited
  • 2018What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing's ‘death penalty'144 cited
  • 2019Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology99 cited
  • 2021The lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are inherently unreliable88 cited
  • 2021Assessing Research Misconduct in Randomized Controlled Trials37 cited
  • 2021When beauty is but skin deep: dealing with problematic studies in systematic reviews32 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Preventing fraud in biomedical research15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work