Dimensions of couples’ sexual communication, relationship satisfaction, and sexual satisfaction: A meta-analysis.

Allen B. Mallory

135 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Family Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Marriage and Sexual Relationships Attachment and Relationship Dynamics Sexual function and dysfunction studies

Abstract

= .16). Measurement, sample characteristics, and cultural factors have an important role in understanding the link between partners' sexual communication and their relationship and sexual satisfaction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 135 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test 2017Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity 1986Sexual scripts: Permanence and change 1991Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity.2005Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating 2010A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007.2012Sexual Scripts among Young Heterosexually Active Men and Women: Continuity and Change 2005To Know You Is to Love You: The Implications of Global Adoration and Specific Accuracy for Marital Relationships.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.