SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review
10 references·16 citing·43 second hopsampled
Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review (2021)Tools to support the automation of system…Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Updated methodological guidan…Research Screener: a machine learning tool to semi-automate abstract screening for systematic reviews (2021)Research Screener: a machine …Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidan…Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation (2020)Software tools to support tit…A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)A full systematic review was …Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)Toward systematic review auto…Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2018)Making progress with the auto…Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Using text mining for study i…RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials (2015)RobotReviewer: evaluation of …A Microsoft-Excel-based tool for running and critically appraising network meta-analyses—an overview and application of NetMetaXL (2014)A Microsoft-Excel-based tool …Enhancing systematic literature reviews with generative artificial intelligence: development, applications, and performance evaluation (2025)Enhancing systematic literatu…ChatGPT in thematic analysis: Can AI become a research assistant in qualitative research? (2025)ChatGPT in thematic analysis:…Towards the automation of systematic reviews using natural language processing, machine learning, and deep learning: a comprehensive review (2024)Towards the automation of sys…Title and abstract screening for literature reviews using large language models: an exploratory study in the biomedical domain (2024)Title and abstract screening …The SAFE procedure: a practical stopping heuristic for active learning-based screening in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2024)The SAFE procedure: a practic…Potential Roles of Large Language Models in the Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2024)Potential Roles of Large Lang…Automation tools to support undertaking scoping reviews (2024)Automation tools to support u…Applying ChatGPT and AI‐Powered Tools to Accelerate Evidence Reviews (2024)Applying ChatGPT and AI‐Power…An exploration of available methods and tools to improve the efficiency of systematic review production: a scoping review (2024)An exploration of available m…What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies (2023)What are the best methods for…The use of artificial intelligence for automating or semi-automating biomedical literature analyses: A scoping review (2023)The use of artificial intelli…The next generation of machine learning for tracking adaptation texts (2023)The next generation of machin…Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Guidance to best tools and pr…Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Guidance to best tools and pr…Evaluating the efficacy of artificial intelligence tools for the automation of systematic reviews in cancer research: A systematic review (2023)Evaluating the efficacy of ar…Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: Update of a living systematic review (2023)Data extraction methods for s…Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies (2012)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)Automated drawing of network plots in network meta‐analysis (2015)Description of network meta-analysis geometry: A metrics design study (2019)Concepts and emerging issues of network meta-analysis (2021)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Recommendations for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health-care interventions (2017)Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies (2019)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)A topography of climate change research (2020)Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims (2020)Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature (2023)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Meta‐analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—What, why, when, where, and how? (2022)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols (2022)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Early Childhood Screen Use Contexts and Cognitive and Psychosocial Outcomes (2024)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)Abstract screening using the automated tool Rayyan: results of effectiveness in three diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews (2022)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)Can large language models replace humans in systematic reviews? Evaluating GPT ‐4's efficacy in screening and extracting data from peer‐reviewed and grey literature in multiple languages (2024)Maslach Burnout Inventory – General Survey (2024)Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group (2022)“How-to”: scoping review? (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2020Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews7,715 cited
  • 2021Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews1,448 cited
  • 2020A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study685 cited
  • 2015Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches680 cited
  • 2019Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis635 cited
  • 2020Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation448 cited
  • 2015RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials316 cited
  • 2014A Microsoft-Excel-based tool for running and critically appraising network meta-analyses—an overview and application of NetMetaXL209 cited
  • 2018Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR)191 cited
  • 2021Research Screener: a machine learning tool to semi-automate abstract screening for systematic reviews190 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews163 cited
  • 2024Title and abstract screening for literature reviews using large language models: an exploratory study in the biomedical domain150 cited
  • 2024The SAFE procedure: a practical stopping heuristic for active learning-based screening in systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

144 cited
  • 2025ChatGPT in thematic analysis: Can AI become a research assistant in qualitative research?100 cited
  • 2024Towards the automation of systematic reviews using natural language processing, machine learning, and deep learning: a comprehensive review87 cited
  • 2024Potential Roles of Large Language Models in the Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses76 cited
  • 2025Enhancing systematic literature reviews with generative artificial intelligence: development, applications, and performance evaluation68 cited
  • 2023The use of artificial intelligence for automating or semi-automating biomedical literature analyses: A scoping review64 cited
  • 2024An exploration of available methods and tools to improve the efficiency of systematic review production: a scoping review52 cited
  • 2024Applying ChatGPT and AI‐Powered Tools to Accelerate Evidence Reviews47 cited
  • 2023Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews45 cited
  • 2023What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies45 cited
  • 2023Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: Update of a living systematic review44 cited
  • 2024Automation tools to support undertaking scoping reviews43 cited
  • 2023The next generation of machine learning for tracking adaptation texts37 cited
  • 2023Evaluating the efficacy of artificial intelligence tools for the automation of systematic reviews in cancer research: A systematic review37 cited