SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality assessment practice in systematic reviews of mediation studies: results from an overview of systematic reviews
12 references·0 citing·46 second hopsampled
Quality assessment practice in systematic reviews of mediation studies: results from an overview of systematic reviews (2021)Quality assessment practice in systematic…Challenges in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Mediation Analyses (2022)Challenges in Systematic Revi…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review (2019)Tools used to assess the qual…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…An overview of systematic reviews found suboptimal reporting and methodological limitations of mediation studies investigating causal mechanisms (2019)An overview of systematic rev…Psychological mediators of the association between childhood adversities and psychosis: A systematic review (2018)Psychological mediators of th…Childhood adversity as a transdiagnostic risk factor for affective disorders in adulthood: A systematic review focusing on biopsychosocial moderating and mediating variables (2018)Childhood adversity as a tran…A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools (2017)A proposed framework for deve…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies (2015)How do mindfulness-based cogn…No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies (2005)No role for quality scores in…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)A systematic review of tools used to assess the quality of observational studies that examine incidence or prevalence and risk factors for diseases (2010)Identification of Developmental-Behavioral Problems in Primary Care: A Systematic Review (2011)Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy (2013)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (1998)Development and Distortion of Malaysian Public- Private Partnerships: Patronage, Privatised Profits and Pitfalls DOI: 10.1111/j.1467- 8500.2009.00655.x (2010)What defines mindfulness-based programs? The warp and the weft (2016)Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Anxiety and Depression (2017)Younger people are more vulnerable to stress, anxiety and depression during COVID-19 pandemic: A global cross-sectional survey (2020)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Systematic mapping of existing tools to appraise methodological strengths and limitations of qualitative research: first stage in the development of the CAMELOT tool (2019)Critical appraisal (2021)Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Using AI (QUADAS-AI): Protocol for a Qualitative Study (2024)Relationship of Childhood Abuse and Household Dysfunction to Many of the Leading Causes of Death in Adults (1998)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The Role of Attachment Trauma and Disintegrative Pathogenic Processes in the Traumatic-Dissociative Dimension (2019)A systematic review on mediators between adversity and psychosis: potential targets for treatment (2020)Childhood adversity and psychosis: a systematic review of bio-psycho-social mediators and moderators (2020)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2012)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013)Psychological Mediators of the Association Between Childhood Emotional Abuse and Depression: A Systematic Review (2020)Deconstructing pathways to resilience: A systematic review of associations between psychosocial mechanisms and transdiagnostic adult mental health outcomes in the context of adverse childhood experiences (2022)The Association between Differentiation of Self and Life Satisfaction among Chinese Emerging Adults: The Mediating Effect of Hope and Coping Strategies and the Moderating Effect of Child Maltreatment History (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study (2019)Quantifying professionalism in peer review (2020)Relationship between journal impact factor and the thoroughness and helpfulness of peer reviews (2023)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 2015How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies1,711 cited
  • 2005No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies337 cited
  • 2018Psychological mediators of the association between childhood adversities and psychosis: A systematic review126 cited
  • 2017A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools120 cited
  • 2019Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review111 cited
  • 2018Childhood adversity as a transdiagnostic risk factor for affective disorders in adulthood: A systematic review focusing on biopsychosocial moderating and mediating variables110 cited
  • 2019An overview of systematic reviews found suboptimal reporting and methodological limitations of mediation studies investigating causal mechanisms36 cited
  • 2022Challenges in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Mediation Analyses20 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work