SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic Reviews of Systematic Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Studies Reviews in Healthcare Research: How to Assess the Methodological Quality of Included Reviews?
16 references·0 citing·41 second hopsampled
Systematic Reviews of Systematic Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Studies Reviews in Healthcare Research: How to Assess the Methodological Quality of Included Reviews? (2021)Systematic Reviews of Systematic Quantita…Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance (2019)Improving reporting of meta-e…Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence (2017)Convergent and sequential syn…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual) (2015)Using Qualitative Evidence in…Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Summarizing systematic reviewsROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)ROBIS: A new tool to assess r…Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach (2014)Establishing confidence in th…A Dictionary of Epidemiology (DRAFT) (2014)A Dictionary of Epidemiology …Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (2012)Enhancing transparency in rep…Clarifying differences between review designs and methods (2012)Clarifying differences betwee…Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (2011)Methodology in conducting a s…Introduction to systematic reviews (2011)Introduction to systematic re…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)AMSTAR is a reliable and vali…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review (2014)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review (2014)A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences (2016)How Many Interviews Are Enough? (2005)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect (2017)Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study (2019)Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication (2019)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview (2014)An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness (2017)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Mental health outcomes of quarantine and isolation for infection prevention: A systematic umbrella review of the global evidence (2020)Social media use and its impact on adolescent mental health: An umbrella review of the evidence (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses (2018)Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2012Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ3,561 cited
  • 2015Summarizing systematic reviews2,581 cited
  • 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
  • 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
  • 2011Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions1,227 cited
  • 2012Clarifying differences between review designs and methods1,061 cited
  • 2015Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual)864 cited
  • 2014Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach798 cited
  • 2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
  • 2017Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

753 cited
  • 2014A Dictionary of Epidemiology (DRAFT)530 cited
  • 2019Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance466 cited
  • 2011Introduction to systematic reviews463 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.