SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
3.4 The h-index
16 references·1 citing·29 second hop
3.4 The h-index (2020)3.4 The h-indexThe Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for …A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)A review of the literature on…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields (2009)h-Index: A review focused in …Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine (2008)Are there better indices for …Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)Which h-index? — A comparison…What do we know about the h index? (2007)What do we know about the h i…The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level (2007)The h-index: Advantages, limi…Does the h index have predictive power? (2007)Does the h index have predict…Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Theory and practise of the g-…Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Comparison of the Hirsch-inde…Automatic classification of citation function (2006)Automatic classification of c…A Hirsch-type index for journals (2006)A Hirsch-type index for journ…Index aims for fair ranking of scientists (2005)Index aims for fair ranking o…Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? (2005)Does the h-index for ranking …An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Platformization of Scholarly Communication: Academic Social Networking Sites as New Infrastructures and Organizations (2025)Platformization of Scholarly …Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis (2007)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship (2015)A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research (2018)Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university (2009)Living with the H-Index? Metric Assemblages in the Contemporary Academy (2012)A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective (2018)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index (2007)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)Big Data: A Survey (2014)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators (2014)25years at Knowledge-Based Systems: A bibliometric analysis (2015)Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2006Theory and practise of the g-index2,347 cited
  • 2016A review of the literature on citation impact indicators1,344 cited
  • 2007Does the h index have predictive power?973 cited
  • 2009h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields849 cited
  • 2007Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar728 cited
  • 2007What do we know about the h index?671 cited
  • 2006A Hirsch-type index for journals671 cited
  • 2006Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups619 cited
  • 2020The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity571 cited
  • 2007The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level494 cited
  • 2008Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine458 cited
  • 2006Automatic classification of citation function436 cited
  • 2005

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?
398 cited
  • 2005Index aims for fair ranking of scientists388 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Platformization of Scholarly Communication: Academic Social Networking Sites as New Infrastructures and Organizations7 cited