SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
OCLC library holdings: assessing availability of academic books in libraries in print and electronic compared to citations and altmetrics
16 references·1 citing·42 second hop
OCLC library holdings: assessing availability of academic books in libraries in print and electronic compared to citations and altmetrics (2021)OCLC library holdings: assessing availabi…PlumX As a Potential Tool to Assess the Macroscopic Multidimensional Impact of Books (2017)PlumX As a Potential Tool to …Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books (2017)Goodreads reviews to assess t…Filling the citation gap: measuring the multidimensional impact of the academic book at institutional level with PlumX (2017)Filling the citation gap: mea…Web Indicators for Research Evaluation: A Practical Guide (2016)Web Indicators for Research E…The Complexity of Measuring the Impact of Books (2016)The Complexity of Measuring t…Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books? (2016)Are wikipedia citations impor…The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores (2015)The influence of time and dis…The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores (2015)The influence of time and dis…An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi (2015)An automatic method for asses…An automatic method for extracting citations from Google Books (2014)An automatic method for extra…Altmetric: enriching scholarly content with article‐level discussion and metrics (2012)Altmetric: enriching scholarl…Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)Can Tweets Predict Citations?…Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus (2011)Assessing the citation impact…Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences (2009)Libcitations: A measure for c…Mendeley - A Last.fm For Research? (2008)Mendeley - A Last.fm For Rese…Library Catalog Analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study of published book titles in Economics (2008)Library Catalog Analysis as a…Why does library holding format really matter for book impact assessment?: Modelling the relationship between citations and altmetrics with print and electronic holdings (2021)Why does library holding form…Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases (2006)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Alternative metric indicators for funding scheme evaluations (2015)An Evidence-Based Review of Academic Web Search Engines, 2014-2016: Implications for Librarians’ Practice and Research Agenda (2017)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature (2016)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Taking scholarly books into account: current developments in five European countries (2016)Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data (2016)From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry (1991)Can we rank scholarly book publishers? A bibliometric experiment with the field of history (2014)Beyond Coverage: Toward a Bibliometrics for the Humanities (2016)Internet encyclopaedias go head to head (2005)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation (2017)COVID-19 research in Wikipedia (2020)How Frequently Are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited (2020)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published? (2017)Critical rationalism and the search for standard (field-normalized) indicators in bibliometrics (2018)Convergent validity of several indicators measuring disruptiveness with milestone assignments to physics papers by experts (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. (2005)Exploring Goodreads reviews for book impact assessment (2019)Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)The controversial policies of journal ratings: evaluating social sciences and humanities (2010)Criteria for assessing research quality in the humanities: a Delphi study among scholars of English literature, German literature and art history (2013)Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? An analysis of mendeley readers (2014)M endeley readership counts: An investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2015)Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics (2015)Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact (2015)Altmetrics: an analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media (2016)Measuring scientific impact beyond academia: An assessment of existing impact metrics and proposed improvements (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact1,085 cited
  • 2012Altmetric: enriching scholarly content with article‐level discussion and metrics218 cited
  • 2011Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus160 cited
  • 2009Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences117 cited
  • 2008Mendeley - A Last.fm For Research?110 cited
  • 2016Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books?95 cited
  • 2008Library Catalog Analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study of published book titles in Economics89 cited
  • 2017Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books57 cited
  • 2014An automatic method for extracting citations from Google Books51 cited
  • 2016Web Indicators for Research Evaluation: A Practical Guide44 cited
  • 2017Filling the citation gap: measuring the multidimensional impact of the academic book at institutional level with PlumX38 cited
  • 2015An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi33 cited
  • 2017PlumX As a Potential Tool to Assess the Macroscopic Multidimensional Impact of Books31 cited
  • 2015

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores
26 cited
  • 2016The Complexity of Measuring the Impact of Books25 cited
  • 2015The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores21 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Why does library holding format really matter for book impact assessment?: Modelling the relationship between citations and altmetrics with print and electronic holdings8 cited