SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
PRILE 2021 guidelines for reporting laboratory studies in Endodontology: A consensus‐based development
3 references·6 citing·29 second hop
PRILE 2021 guidelines for reporting laboratory studies in Endodontology: A consensus‐based development (2021)PRILE 2021 guidelines for reporting labor…The STROCSS statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery (2017)The STROCSS statement: Streng…CRIS Guidelines (Checklist for Reporting In-vitro Studies): A concept note on the need for standardized guidelines for improving quality and transparency in reporting in-vitro studies in experimental dental research (2014)CRIS Guidelines (Checklist fo…Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…Top 100 most‐cited scientific articles in regenerative endodontics 2019–2023: A bibliometric analysis (2024)Top 100 most‐cited scientific…PRIDASE 2024 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in endodontics: Explanation and elaboration (2024)PRIDASE 2024 guidelines for r…PRIDASE 2024 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in endodontics: A consensus‐based development (2024)PRIDASE 2024 guidelines for r…PROBE 2023 guidelines for reporting observational studies in endodontics: Explanation and elaboration (2023)PROBE 2023 guidelines for rep…Methodological quality assessment criteria for the evaluation of laboratory‐based studies included in systematic reviews within the specialty of Endodontology: A development protocol (2022)Methodological quality assess…PRILE 2021 guidelines for reporting laboratory studies in Endodontology: explanation and elaboration (2021)PRILE 2021 guidelines for rep…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery (2021)Mapping the Literature on Academic Publishing: A Bibliometric Analysis on WOS (2023)The STROCSS 2024 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional, and case–control studies in surgery (2024)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2008)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique (2000)STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)New evidence pyramid (2016)Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A protocol for developing reporting guidelines for laboratory studies in Endodontology (2019)Insufficient transparency of statistical reporting in preclinical research: a scoping review (2021)Development and validation of a risk-of-bias tool for assessing in vitro studies conducted in dentistry: The QUIN (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 2017The STROCSS statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery784 cited
  • 2014CRIS Guidelines (Checklist for Reporting In-vitro Studies): A concept note on the need for standardized guidelines for improving quality and transparency in reporting in-vitro studies in experimental dental research453 cited

Cited by

  • 2021PRILE 2021 guidelines for reporting laboratory studies in Endodontology: explanation and elaboration116 cited
  • 2023PROBE 2023 guidelines for reporting observational studies in endodontics: Explanation and elaboration30 cited
  • 2024Top 100 most‐cited scientific articles in regenerative endodontics 2019–2023: A bibliometric analysis21 cited
  • 2024PRIDASE 2024 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in endodontics: Explanation and elaboration12 cited
  • 2024PRIDASE 2024 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in endodontics: A consensus‐based development10 cited
  • 2022Methodological quality assessment criteria for the evaluation of laboratory‐based studies included in systematic reviews within the specialty of Endodontology: A development protocol9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work