SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Weight of Surgical Knowledge
6 references·0 citing·28 second hop
The Weight of Surgical Knowledge (2021)The Weight of Surgical KnowledgeCitation Inaccuracies in Influential Surgical Journals (2021)Citation Inaccuracies in Infl…Meta-assessment of bias in science (2017)Meta-assessment of bias in sc…Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Software survey: VOSviewer, a…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…What American surgeons read: a survey of a thousand Fellows of the American College of Surgeons (2000)What American surgeons read: …The Weight of Medical Knowledge (1978)The Weight of Medical Knowled…Little Science, Big Science (1963)The American Journal of Public Health, 1911-85. (1986)Authorship: “Law” and Order (1999)Publication Growth in Biological Sub-Fields: Patterns, Predictability and Sustainability (2012)The relationship between journal use in a medical library and citation use. (1998)Ophthalmology and vision science research (2005)The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties (2012)A Bibliometric Analysis on Top-Cited Articles in Pain Research (2013)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)The earth is flat ( p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research (2017)What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research. (2018)Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis (2019)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Reference Hygiene and Death on the Internet – Decay, Rot, Half-Life, Deterioration, and Corruption (2022)Read Before You Cite! (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping21,418 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2017Meta-assessment of bias in science364 cited
  • 1978The Weight of Medical Knowledge90 cited
  • 2000What American surgeons read: a survey of a thousand Fellows of the American College of Surgeons55 cited
  • 2021Citation Inaccuracies in Influential Surgical Journals13 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work