SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The APISSER Methodology for Systematic Literature Reviews in Engineering
12 references·0 citing·42 second hopsampled
The APISSER Methodology for Systematic Literature Reviews in Engineering (2022)The APISSER Methodology for Systematic Li…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and e…Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)Automation of systematic lite…Methodology for systematic literature review applied to engineering and education (2018)Methodology for systematic li…Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017)Guidance on Conducting a Syst…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review (2015)A Guide to Conducting a Stand…Systematic Literature Reviews in Engineering Education and Other Developing Interdisciplinary Fields (2014)Systematic Literature Reviews…The systematic literature review as a research genre (2011)The systematic literature rev…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace (1981)Style: Lessons in Clarity and…Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness (2003)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education (2017)Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: a review of literature (2020)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Review : Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations And Research Issues1,2 (2001)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research (2020)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Responsible artificial intelligence governance: A review and research framework (2025)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications (2018)How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions (2023)Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews (2004)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)If online learning works for you, what about deaf students? Emerging challenges of online learning for deaf and hearing-impaired students during COVID-19: a literature review (2022)Speech emotion recognition using machine learning — A systematic review (2023)Heterogeneous data integration: Challenges and opportunities (2024)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature (2023)Towards the automation of systematic reviews using natural language processing, machine learning, and deep learning: a comprehensive review (2024)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews13,845 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
  • 2021PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews11,660 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2017Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review3,449 cited
  • 2015A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review1,411 cited
  • 2014Systematic Literature Reviews in Engineering Education and Other Developing Interdisciplinary Fields622 cited
  • 2021Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review430 cited
  • 2018Methodology for systematic literature review applied to engineering and education282 cited
  • 1981Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace84 cited
  • 2011The systematic literature review as a research genre46 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work