SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessing the causal relationship between income inequality and mortality and self-rated health: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
16 references·2 citing·42 second hop
Assessing the causal relationship between income inequality and mortality and self-rated health: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)Assessing the causal relationship between…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Income inequality and health: A causal review (2014)Income inequality and health:…GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating u…GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating t…GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating t…GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias (2011)GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating t…GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating t…GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating th…The spirit level : why equality is better for everyone (2010)The spirit level : why equali…Income, Health, and Well-Being around the World: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll (2008)Income, Health, and Well-Bein…Income inequality and population health: A review and explanation of the evidence (2005)Income inequality and populat…Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries (2000)Inequality and Growth in a Pa…Income inequality and mortality: importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions (2000)Income inequality and mortali…Self-Rated Health and Mortality: A Review of Twenty-Seven Community Studies (1997)Self-Rated Health and Mortali…The Changing Relation between Mortality and level of Economic Development (1975)The Changing Relation between…No meta-analytical effect of economic inequality on well-being or mental health (2025)No meta-analytical effect of …Applying Bradford Hill to assessing causality in systematic reviews: A transparent approach using process tracing (2024)Applying Bradford Hill to ass…Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries (1989)Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries (1991)Corruption and Growth (1995)Growth is Good for the Poor (2001)Religion and Economic Growth across Countries (2003)Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth (2014)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)A Global Measure of Perceived Stress (1983)Stress, appraisal, and coping (1985)Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. (1988)Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question (2005)Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. (2000)Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review (2010)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001-2014 (2016)Life Expectancy and Mortality Rates in the United States, 1959-2017 (2019)COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. (2020)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Culture and health (2014)The political origins of health inequity: prospects for change (2014)The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems (2016)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 1997Self-Rated Health and Mortality: A Review of Twenty-Seven Community Studies8,592 cited
  • 2010The spirit level : why equality is better for everyone2,997 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)2,798 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision2,681 cited
  • 2000Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries2,676 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency2,318 cited
  • 2014Income inequality and health: A causal review2,099 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness1,838 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias1,817 cited
  • 2005Income inequality and population health: A review and explanation of the evidence1,782 cited
  • 1975The Changing Relation between Mortality and level of Economic Development1,680 cited
  • 2008Income, Health, and Well-Being around the World: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll1,634 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2000
Income inequality and mortality: importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions
1,507 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence1,335 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025No meta-analytical effect of economic inequality on well-being or mental health14 cited
    • 2024Applying Bradford Hill to assessing causality in systematic reviews: A transparent approach using process tracing7 cited