SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in Psychology: A scoping review
16 references·1 citing·33 second hop
Reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in Psychology: A scoping review (2022)Reporting characteristics of systematic r…Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review (2020)Impact of COVID-19 pandemic o…How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study (2020)How are systematic reviews of…How Often Do Systematic Reviews Exclude Articles Not Published in English? (2019)How Often Do Systematic Revie…What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)What kind of systematic revie…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses (2018)How to Do a Systematic Review…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…What Is the State of theArt of Systematic Reviewin Engineering Education? (2015)What Is the State of theArt o…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review (2012)What is the most appropriate …Meta-Analysis and the Development of Knowledge (2012)Meta-Analysis and the Develop…Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2011)Cochrane Database of Systemat…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews (1996)Completeness of reporting of …Evidence syntheses in educational technology research: What is not published in English is not visible? A tertiary mapping review (2025)Evidence syntheses in educati…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The development of software to support multiple systematic review types (2018)The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. (1995)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning (2021)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China (2020)Trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms during enforced isolation due to COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal observational study (2020)A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 (2021)The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on child and adolescent mental health: systematic review (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses (2012)Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of eating disorders (2014)Effects of music interventions on stress-related outcomes: a systematic review and two meta-analyses (2019)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2020Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review5,198 cited
  • 2011Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews4,664 cited
  • 2018How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses2,546 cited
  • 2018What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences1,160 cited
  • 1996Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews538 cited
  • 2020How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study358 cited
  • 2012What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

345 cited
  • 2019How Often Do Systematic Reviews Exclude Articles Not Published in English?139 cited
  • 2012Meta-Analysis and the Development of Knowledge126 cited
  • 2015What Is the State of theArt of Systematic Reviewin Engineering Education?124 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Evidence syntheses in educational technology research: What is not published in English is not visible? A tertiary mapping review10 cited