SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
State of open science practices in france (SOSP-FR)
10 references·0 citing·43 second hop
State of open science practices in france (SOSP-FR) (2022)State of open science practices in france…Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Two new Later Stone Age sites…The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)The evolving role of preprint…Preprints: Their Evolving Role in Science Communication (2021)Preprints: Their Evolving Rol…Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review—A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists (2021)Attitudes and practices of op…Worldwide inequality in access to full text scientific articles: the example of ophthalmology (2019)Worldwide inequality in acces…The Ecosystem of Technologies for Social Science Research (2019)The Ecosystem of Technologies…Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Predatory journals: no defini…Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices (2017)Early career researchers and …A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)A multi-disciplinary perspect…Innovations in scholarly communication - global survey on research tool usage (2016)Innovations in scholarly comm…Social media use in the research workflow (2011)Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey (2012)Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit (2015)Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers (2017)A global questionnaire survey of the scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers (2020)Factors influencing researchers’ journal selection decisions (2020)The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1966)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The Sci-Hub effect on papers’ citations (2021)Poor visibility of retracted articles: a problem that should no longer be ignored (2023)Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers (2023)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. (1967)Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer (2018)Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis (2020)The composition of data economy: a bibliometric approach and TCCM framework of conceptual, intellectual and social structure (2022)Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines (2023)Additional experiments required: A scoping review of recent evidence on key aspects of Open Peer Review (2024)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Preprint paper platforms in the academic scholarly communication environment (2021)Document analysis of the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World’s scientific outputs and activities: a case study in contemporary tobacco industry agnogenesis (2023)Sneaked references: Fabricated reference metadata distort citation counts (2024)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Bias in peer review (2012)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Analyzing the follower–followee ratio to determine user characteristics and institutional participation differences among research universities on ResearchGate (2018)Researchers’ online visibility: tensions of visibility, trust and reputation (2018)Conjoint analysis of researchers' hidden preferences for bibliometrics, altmetrics, and usage metrics (2021)Digital methods for social sciences (2024)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2024Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal23,871 cited
  • 2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence725 cited
  • 2021The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape556 cited
  • 2017A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review293 cited
  • 2017Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices189 cited
  • 2016Innovations in scholarly communication - global survey on research tool usage77 cited
  • 2019Worldwide inequality in access to full text scientific articles: the example of ophthalmology42 cited
  • 2021Preprints: Their Evolving Role in Science Communication30 cited
  • 2021Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review—A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists23 cited
  • 2019The Ecosystem of Technologies for Social Science Research7 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work