SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Planning, design and logistics of a decision analysis study: The FBI/Ames study involving forensic firearms examiners
16 references·3 citing·38 second hop
Planning, design and logistics of a decision analysis study: The FBI/Ames study involving forensic firearms examiners (2022)Planning, design and logistics of a decis…Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: “Inconclusive” decisions and the structure of error rate studies (2021)Forensic science and the prin…Who knew? The misleading specificity of “double-blind” and what to do about it (2020)Who knew? The misleading spec…The Error in ‘Error Rate’: Why Error Rates Are So Needed, Yet So Elusive (2020)The Error in ‘Error Rate’: Wh…(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science (2020)(Mis)use of scientific measur…Validity and reliability of forensic firearm examiners (2019)Validity and reliability of f…A call for more science in forensic science (2018)A call for more science in fo…“Cannot Decide”: The Fine Line Between Appropriate Inconclusive Determinations Versus Unjustifiably Deciding Not To Decide (2018)“Cannot Decide”: The Fine Lin…Fingerprints and Other Ridge Skin Impressions (2016)Fingerprints and Other Ridge …A Study of False-Positive and False-Negative Error Rates in Cartridge Case Comparisons (2014)A Study of False-Positive and…Repeatability and Reproducibility of Decisions by Latent Fingerprint Examiners (2012)Repeatability and Reproducibi…Confocal Microscopy Analysis of Breech Face Marks on Fired Cartridge Cases from 10 Consecutively Manufactured Pistol Slides* (2012)Confocal Microscopy Analysis …Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions (2011)Accuracy and reliability of f…Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Strengthening Forensic Scienc…A Perspective on Errors, Bias, and Interpretation in the Forensic Sciences and Direction for Continuing Advancement* (2009)A Perspective on Errors, Bias…Fingerprint Error Rates and Proficiency Tests: What They are and Why They Matter (2008)Fingerprint Error Rates and P…Defending the Scientific Foundations of the Firearms and Tool Mark Identification Discipline: Responding to Recent Challenges (2007)Defending the Scientific Foun…Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons (2024)Methodological problems in ev…Shining a Light on Forensic Black-Box Studies (2023)Shining a Light on Forensic B…Repeatability and reproducibility of comparison decisions by firearms examiners (2023)Repeatability and reproducibi…What made us ever think we could individualize using statistics? (1991)Modern scientific evidence : the law and science of expert testimony (2006)Automatic Comparison and Evaluation of Impressions Left by a Firearm on Fired Cartridge Cases (2014)Individualization is dead, long live individualization! Reforms of reporting practices for fingerprint analysis in the United States (2014)Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners (2022)Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. (2013)Trusting Judgements: How to Get the Best out of Experts (2015)Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. (1981)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (2004)Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications (2005)Dental identification by comparison of antemortem and postmortem dental radiographs: Influence of operator qualifications and cognitive bias (2012)Proficiency tests to estimate error rates in the forensic sciences (2012)Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook (2019)Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. (1971)Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives (1981)Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments (1989)A hierarchy of expert performance. (2016)Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners (2016)Suspect Identities (2001)A cultural change to enable improved decision-making in forensic science: A six phased approach (2019)Advancing a paradigm shift in evaluation of forensic evidence: The rise of forensic data science (2022)Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence (2023)Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition (1990)Being and nothingness : a phenomenological essay on ontology (1992)Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. (1993)ISO Standards Addressing Issues of Bias and Impartiality in Forensic Work (2019)The logic of scientific discovery (1959)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. (1962)The distinction between discriminability and reliability in forensic science (2021)Expertise in Fingerprint Identification (2013)Perceptions and estimates of error rates in forensic science: A survey of forensic analysts (2019)Cationic dye-diatomite composites: Novel dusting powders for developing latent fingerprints (2018)Study of latent fingerprints – A review (2023)De Novo Green Fluorescent Protein Chromophore-Based Probes for Capturing Latent Fingerprints Using a Portable System (2024)The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law (2012)Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them? (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward1,298 cited
  • 2011Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions349 cited
  • 2016Fingerprints and Other Ridge Skin Impressions197 cited
  • 2012Repeatability and Reproducibility of Decisions by Latent Fingerprint Examiners180 cited
  • 2009A Perspective on Errors, Bias, and Interpretation in the Forensic Sciences and Direction for Continuing Advancement*129 cited
  • 2020(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science83 cited
  • 2018“Cannot Decide”: The Fine Line Between Appropriate Inconclusive Determinations Versus Unjustifiably Deciding Not To Decide74 cited
  • 2018A call for more science in forensic science65 cited
  • 2007Defending the Scientific Foundations of the Firearms and Tool Mark Identification Discipline: Responding to Recent Challenges58 cited
  • 2008Fingerprint Error Rates and Proficiency Tests: What They are and Why They Matter54 cited
  • 2019Validity and reliability of forensic firearm examiners53 cited
  • 2014A Study of False-Positive and False-Negative Error Rates in Cartridge Case Comparisons46 cited
  • 2020The Error in ‘Error Rate’: Why Error Rates Are So Needed, Yet So Elusive43 cited
  • 2020Who knew? The misleading specificity of “double-blind” and what to do about it

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

41 cited
  • 2012Confocal Microscopy Analysis of Breech Face Marks on Fired Cartridge Cases from 10 Consecutively Manufactured Pistol Slides*40 cited
  • 2021Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: “Inconclusive” decisions and the structure of error rate studies38 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Repeatability and reproducibility of comparison decisions by firearms examiners16 cited
    • 2024Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons15 cited
    • 2023Shining a Light on Forensic Black-Box Studies12 cited