SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The evolution, benefits, and challenges of preprints and their interaction with journals
5 references·4 citing·38 second hop
The evolution, benefits, and challenges of preprints and their interaction with journals (2022)The evolution, benefits, and challenges o…Preprints Involving Medical Research—Do the Benefits Outweigh the Challenges? (2020)Preprints Involving Medical R…Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)Ten Hot Topics around Scholar…On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective (2019)On the value of preprints: An…Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators (2013)Gap between science and media…Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias (2005)Systematic review of publicat…To preprint or not to preprint: A global researcher survey (2024)To preprint or not to preprin…The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review (2023)The use and acceptability of …The experiences of COVID-19 preprint authors: a survey of researchers about publishing and receiving feedback on their work during the pandemic (2023)The experiences of COVID-19 p…Dissemination of Registered COVID-19 Clinical Trials (DIRECCT): a cross-sectional study (2023)Dissemination of Registered C…Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press (2004)The Triple Helix (2008)The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation In Action (2008)Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (2014)An empirical examination of echo chambers in US climate policy networks (2015)Scientists’ Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement (2016)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Forensic Economics (2012)The Association between Pathological Internet Use and Comorbid Psychopathology: A Systematic Review (2012)p-Hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates. (2019)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology (2019)Rise of the Rxivs: How Preprint Servers are Changing the Publishing Process (2020)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers (2019)No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic (2020)“Real impact”: Challenges and opportunities in bridging the gap between research and practice – Making a difference in industry, policy, and society (2024)The Global village (1990)Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation (2021)Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice (2021)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)PreprintMatch: A tool for preprint to publication detection shows global inequities in scientific publication (2023)Accelerating scientific publication in biology (2015)Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19 (2020)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic (2022)Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) (2004)Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article (2019)Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators354 cited
  • 2019On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective184 cited
  • 2005Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias153 cited
  • 2019Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing128 cited
  • 2020Preprints Involving Medical Research—Do the Benefits Outweigh the Challenges?115 cited

Cited by

  • 2024To preprint or not to preprint: A global researcher survey41 cited
  • 2023The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review23 cited
  • 2023The experiences of COVID-19 preprint authors: a survey of researchers about publishing and receiving feedback on their work during the pandemic16 cited
  • 2023Dissemination of Registered COVID-19 Clinical Trials (DIRECCT): a cross-sectional study9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work