Employer image within and across industries: Moving beyond assessing points‐of‐relevance to identifying points‐of‐difference

Greet Van Hoye · Filip Lievens · Bert Weijters · Saartje Cromheecke

19 citations0/0 files storedHuman Resource Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Employer Branding and e-HRM Higher Education and Employability Corporate Identity and Reputation

Abstract

Abstract This study draws from brand positioning research to introduce the notions of points‐of‐relevance and points‐of‐difference to employer image research. Similar to prior research, this means that we start by investigating the relevant image attributes (points‐of‐relevance) that potential applicants use for judging organizations' attractiveness as an employer. However, we go beyond past research by examining whether the same points‐of‐relevance are used within and across industries. Next, we further extend current research by identifying which of the relevant image attributes also serve as points‐of‐difference for distinguishing between organizations and industries. The sample consisted of 24 organizations from 6 industries (total N = 7171). As a first key result, across industries and organizations, individuals attached similar importance to the same instrumental (job content, working conditions, and compensation) and symbolic (innovativeness, gentleness, and competence) image attributes in judging organizational attractiveness. Second, organizations and industries varied significantly on both instrumental and symbolic image attributes, with job content and innovativeness emerging as the strongest points‐of‐difference. Third, most image attributes showed greater variation between industries than between organizations, pointing at the importance of studying employer image at the industry level. Implications for recruitment research, employer branding, and best employer competitions are discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 19 citations exist upstream.

References

1985Competitive advantage, creating and sustaining superior performance 2002A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.1997Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity 1998Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross‐National Consumer Research 1997Dimensions of Brand Personality 2000Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity.2007The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs 1998Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.