SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Biological plausibility in environmental health systematic reviews: a GRADE concept paper
13 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Biological plausibility in environmental health systematic reviews: a GRADE concept paper (2022)Biological plausibility in environmental …Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER) (2020)Recommendations for the condu…Advancing systematic-review methodology in exposure science for environmental health decision making (2020)Advancing systematic-review m…GRADE guidelines for environmental and occupational health: A new series of articles in Environment International (2019)GRADE guidelines for environm…Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes (2018)Identifying the PECO: A frame…GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence (2018)GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROB…The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence (2017)The GRADE Working Group clari…Developing the WCRF International/University of Bristol Methodology for Identifying and Carrying Out Systematic Reviews of Mechanisms of Exposure–Cancer Associations (2017)Developing the WCRF Internati…A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology (2017)A primer on systematic review…Use of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Environmental Health Epidemiology: a Systematic Review and Comparison with Guidelines (2015)Use of Systematic Review and …Implementing systematic review techniques in chemical risk assessment: Challenges, opportunities and recommendations (2015)Implementing systematic revie…On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies (2014)On the use of systematic revi…Non‐randomized studies as a source of complementary, sequential or replacement evidence for randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions (2013)Non‐randomized studies as a s…GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating t…External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Interpreting Results and Drawing Conclusions (2008)Improving GRADE evidence tables part 3: detailed guidance for explanatory footnotes supports creating and understanding GRADE certainty in the evidence judgments (2016)Combining randomized and non‐randomized evidence in network meta‐analysis (2017)GRADE guidance 24 optimizing the integration of randomized and non-randomized studies of interventions in evidence syntheses and health guidelines (2021)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Conceptualizing the transfer of knowledge across cases in transdisciplinary research (2017)Smart Manufacturing Systems and Applied Industrial Technologies for a Sustainable Industry: A Systematic Literature Review (2020)Guidelines for developing a systematic literature review for studies related to climate change adaptation (2021)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies (2014)RoB-SPEO: A tool for assessing risk of bias in studies estimating the prevalence of exposure to occupational risk factors from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)A Survey of Systematic Evidence Mapping Practice and the Case for Knowledge Graphs in Environmental Health and Toxicology (2020)Reviewing the animal literature: how to describe and choose between different types of literature reviews (2020)The methodological rigour of systematic reviews in environmental health (2022)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE Guidelines 28: Use of GRADE for the assessment of evidence about prognostic factors: rating certainty in identification of groups of patients with different absolute risks (2020)GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence—An overview in the context of health decision-making (2020)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Biological plausibility in environmental health systematic reviews: a GRADE concept paper (2022)Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains (2018)Completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence (2019)A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E) (2024)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Literature searching methods or guidance and their application to public health topics: A narrative review (2021)Systematic reviews and meta-analyses for the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury (2021)COSMOS-E: Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology (2019)Impact of COVID-19 on people with physical disabilities: A rapid review (2020)Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Older Adults: Rapid Review (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness1,838 cited
  • 2018Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes1,337 cited
  • 2018GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence907 cited
  • 2017The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence847 cited
  • 2013Non‐randomized studies as a source of complementary, sequential or replacement evidence for randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions248 cited
  • 2014On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies137 cited
  • 2015Implementing systematic review techniques in chemical risk assessment: Challenges, opportunities and recommendations92 cited
  • 2020Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER)91 cited
  • 2017A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology85 cited
  • 2017Developing the WCRF International/University of Bristol Methodology for Identifying and Carrying Out Systematic Reviews of Mechanisms of Exposure–Cancer Associations40 cited
  • 2020Advancing systematic-review methodology in exposure science for environmental health decision making31 cited
  • 2015Use of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Environmental Health Epidemiology: a Systematic Review and Comparison with Guidelines24 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2019GRADE guidelines for environmental and occupational health: A new series of articles in Environment International22 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.