No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Main text(Patterns 3, 100409, February 11, 2022)In the originally published version of this article, Table 9 and Figure 11 had incorrect values due to an inadvertent error by the authors. In Table 9, for city mentions in old movies (1950-1969), Bombay/Mumbai should read 51, not 55; Delhi should read 27, not 30; Agra should read 6, not 50; Mathura should read 5, not 6; Kolkata/Calcutta (23), Madras/Chennai (10), and Simla/Shimla (6) should be included; and Daman, Jalgaon, and Allahabad should be removed. For mid movies (1970-1999), Bombay/Mumbai should read 68, not 73; Delhi should read 45, not 46; Pune should read 8, not 9; Bangalore/Bengaluru should read 7, not 8; Nagpur should read 6, not 7; Kolkata/Calcutta (18), Simla/Shimla (12), Madras/Chennai (10) should be included; and Agra, Daman, and Rampur should be removed. For new movies (2000-2020), Bombay/Mumbai should read 83, not 91; Delhi should read 52, not 63; Bangalore/Bengaluru should read 9, not 11; Pune should read 8, not 10; Lucknow should read 7, not 8; Hyderabad should read 6, not 9; Kolkata/Calcutta (9) and Madras/ Chennai (6) should be included; and Agra and Chandigarh should be removed. The title of Table 9 has also been updated to include the full year (e.g., 1950-1969) rather than a shortened form (1950-69).In Figure 11C, “No representation” should read “Least/No representation,” and “States never mentioned in 70 years” should read “Least/No State Mentions in the last 70 years”. Additionally, the legend (C) should now read “States with least or no representation (less than 0.2% movies in the entire corpus) in our corpus in the last 70 years” rather than “States never mentioned in our corpus in the last 70 years.”In the text, the sentence “As of 2021, India has 29 states and seven union territories” was incorrect and should read “As of 2021, India has 28 states and eight union territories.” Also, regarding under-representation in northeastern states, we inadvertently included Manipur and Tripura in the sentence “In fact, there have been zero mentions of the states of Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram in over 700 movies across 70 years.” It should instead read “In fact, there have been zero mentions of the states of Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, and Mizoram in over 700 movies across 70 years.”Figure 11. Geographic representation in Bollywood movies (original)View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) Main text(Patterns 3, 100409, February 11, 2022)In the originally published version of this article, Table 9 and Figure 11 had incorrect values due to an inadvertent error by the authors. In Table 9, for city mentions in old movies (1950-1969), Bombay/Mumbai should read 51, not 55; Delhi should read 27, not 30; Agra should read 6, not 50; Mathura should read 5, not 6; Kolkata/Calcutta (23), Madras/Chennai (10), and Simla/Shimla (6) should be included; and Daman, Jalgaon, and Allahabad should be removed. For mid movies (1970-1999), Bombay/Mumbai should read 68, not 73; Delhi should read 45, not 46; Pune should read 8, not 9; Bangalore/Bengaluru should read 7, not 8; Nagpur should read 6, not 7; Kolkata/Calcutta (18), Simla/Shimla (12), Madras/Chennai (10) should be included; and Agra, Daman, and Rampur should be removed. For new movies (2000-2020), Bombay/Mumbai should read 83, not 91; Delhi should read 52, not 63; Bangalore/Bengaluru should read 9, not 11; Pune should read 8, not 10; Lucknow should read 7, not 8; Hyderabad should read 6, not 9; Kolkata/Calcutta (9) and Madras/ Chennai (6) should be included; and Agra and Chandigarh should be removed. The title of Table 9 has also been updated to include the full year (e.g., 1950-1969) rather than a shortened form (1950-69).In Figure 11C, “No representation” should read “Least/No representation,” and “States never mentioned in 70 years” should read “Least/No State Mentions in the last 70 years”. Additionally, the legend (C) should now read “States with least or no representation (less than 0.2% movies in the entire corpus) in our corpus in the last 70 years” rather than “States never mentioned in our corpus in the last 70 years.”In the text, the sentence “As of 2021, India has 29 states and seven union territories” was incorrect and should read “As of 2021, India has 28 states and eight union territories.” Also, regarding under-representation in northeastern states, we inadvertently included Manipur and Tripura in the sentence “In fact, there have been zero mentions of the states of Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram in over 700 movies across 70 years.” It should instead read “In fact, there have been zero mentions of the states of Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, and Mizoram in over 700 movies across 70 years.” (Patterns 3, 100409, February 11, 2022) In the originally published version of this article, Table 9 and Figure 11 had incorrect values due to an inadvertent error by the authors. In Table 9, for city mentions in old movies (1950-1969), Bombay/Mumbai should read 51, not 55; Delhi should read 27, not 30; Agra should read 6, not 50; Mathura should read 5, not 6; Kolkata/Calcutta (23), Madras/Chennai (10), and Simla/Shimla (6) should be included; and Daman, Jalgaon, and Allahabad should be removed. For mid movies (1970-1999), Bombay/Mumbai should read 68, not 73; Delhi should read 45, not 46; Pune should read 8, not 9; Bangalore/Bengaluru should read 7, not 8; Nagpur should read 6, not 7; Kolkata/Calcutta (18), Simla/Shimla (12), Madras/Chennai (10) should be included; and Agra, Daman, and Rampur should be removed. For new movies (2000-2020), Bombay/Mumbai should read 83, not 91; Delhi should read 52, not 63; Bangalore/Bengaluru should read 9, not 11; Pune should read 8, not 10; Lucknow should read 7, not 8; Hyderabad should read 6, not 9; Kolkata/Calcutta (9) and Madras/ Chennai (6) should be included; and Agra and Chandigarh should be removed. The title of Table 9 has also been updated to include the full year (e.g., 1950-1969) rather than a shortened form (1950-69). In Figure 11C, “No representation” should read “Least/No representation,” and “States never mentioned in 70 years” should read “Least/No State Mentions in the last 70 years”. Additionally, the legend (C) should now read “States with least or no representation (less than 0.2% movies in the entire corpus) in our corpus in the last 70 years” rather than “States never mentioned in our corpus in the last 70 years.” In the text, the sentence “As of 2021, India has 29 states and seven union territories” was incorrect and should read “As of 2021, India has 28 states and eight union territories.” Also, regarding under-representation in northeastern states, we inadvertently included Manipur and Tripura in the sentence “In fact, there have been zero mentions of the states of Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram in over 700 movies across 70 years.” It should instead read “In fact, there have been zero mentions of the states of Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, and Mizoram in over 700 movies across 70 years.” Gender bias, social bias, and representation in Bollywood and HollywoodKhadilkar et al.PatternsDecember 9, 2021In BriefWe present a comprehensive analysis of gender and social biases present in English subtitles of popular Bollywood movies, spanning 70 years, using cutting-edge natural language processing techniques. We also consider popular Hollywood movies and movies nominated for the Academy Awards to compare and contrast our findings. Our study uncovers social biases along the lines of colorism, son preference, and geographic and religious representation. Full-Text PDF Open AccessGender bias, social bias, and representation in Bollywood and HollywoodKhadilkar et al.PatternsApril 08, 2022In Brief(Patterns 3, 100409; February 11, 2022) Full-Text PDF Open Access
Loading…
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.