References

• 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
• 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
• 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
• 2007External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)569 cited
• 2010From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence- Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance~!2009-10-24~!2009-10-03~!2010-07-16~!329 cited
• 2017The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar248 cited
• 2018The effects of public health policies on health inequalities in high-income countries: an umbrella review234 cited
• 2019A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool207 cited
• 2014Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties161 cited
• 2018Minor differences were found between AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS in the assessment of systematic reviews including both randomized and nonrandomized studies118 cited
• 2016Umbrella Reviews117 cited
• 2013Systematic reviews explained: AMSTAR-how to tell the good from the bad and the ugly.116 cited
• 2017