SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Neurosurgical Publication—Should We Publish at Any Cost? An In-Depth Analysis of Costs Incurred in Publication
7 references·0 citing·34 second hop
Neurosurgical Publication—Should We Publish at Any Cost? An In-Depth Analysis of Costs Incurred in Publication (2022)Neurosurgical Publication—Should We Publi…Toward transparency of hybrid open access through publisher‐provided metadata: An article‐level study of Elsevier (2021)Toward transparency of hybrid…Publishing at any cost: a cross-sectional study of the amount that medical researchers spend on open access publishing each year (2021)Publishing at any cost: a cro…Who Pays? Comparing Cost Sharing Models for a Gold Open Access Publication Environment (2020)Who Pays? Comparing Cost Shar…Correlation Between Cost of Publication and Journal Impact. Comprehensive Cross-sectional Study of Exclusively Open-Access Surgical Journals (2018)Correlation Between Cost of P…The “total cost of publication” in a hybrid open‐access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article‐processing charges in combination with subscriptions (2015)The “total cost of publicatio…Creative Commons and the Openness of Open Access (2013)Creative Commons and the Open…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2011)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Article processing charges for open access publication—the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada (2016)Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature (2017)Open-access mega-journals (2017)For the Sake of Inquiry and Knowledge — The Inevitability of Open Access (2013)Open but Not Free — Publishing in the 21st Century (2013)The Continued Movement for Open Access to Peer-Reviewed Literature (2013)The Downside of Open-Access Publishing (2013)International dissemination of evidence-based practice, open access and the IACAPAP textbook of child and adolescent mental health (2015)Las revistas científicas en América Latina hacia el camino del acceso abierto: un diagnóstico de políticas y estrategias editoriales (2016)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. (2012)Want a better h-index? – All you need to know about copyright and open access (2020)Introducing ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education: A Bibliometric Analysis Study for Understanding Internationalization (2022)Learning and teaching Chinese as a foreign language: A scoping review (2022)Social Stratification in Science (1974)Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting (2016)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards (2011)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists (2019)Responsible dissemination of health and medical research: some guidance points (2022)Hybrid Gold Open Access Citation Advantage in Clinical Medicine: Analysis of Hybrid Journals in the Web of Science (2023)The Changing Medical Publishing Industry: Economics, Expansion, and Equity (2023)Frascati Manual 2015 (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Does it pay to pay? A comparison of the benefits of open-access publishing across various sub-fields in biology (2024)Open Access, Scholarly Communication, and Open Science in Psychology: An Overview for Researchers (2024)How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements? (2025)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2015The “total cost of publication” in a hybrid open‐access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article‐processing charges in combination with subscriptions197 cited
  • 2013Creative Commons and the Openness of Open Access51 cited
  • 2018Correlation Between Cost of Publication and Journal Impact. Comprehensive Cross-sectional Study of Exclusively Open-Access Surgical Journals43 cited
  • 2021Publishing at any cost: a cross-sectional study of the amount that medical researchers spend on open access publishing each year36 cited
  • 2021Toward transparency of hybrid open access through publisher‐provided metadata: An article‐level study of Elsevier27 cited
  • 2020Who Pays? Comparing Cost Sharing Models for a Gold Open Access Publication Environment13 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work