Neural reality of argument structure constructions

Abstract

In lexicalist linguistic theories, argument structure is assumed to be predictable from the meaning of verbs.As a result, the verb is the primary determinant of the meaning of a clause.In contrast, construction grammarians propose that argument structure is encoded in constructions (or form-meaning pairs) that are distinct from verbs.Decades of psycholinguistic research have produced substantial empirical evidence in favor of the construction view.Here we adapt several psycholinguistic studies to probe for the existence of argument structure constructions (ASCs) in Transformerbased language models (LMs).First, using a sentence sorting experiment, we find that sentences sharing the same construction are closer in embedding space than sentences sharing the same verb.Furthermore, LMs increasingly prefer grouping by construction with more input data, mirroring the behaviour of non-native language learners.Second, in a "Jabberwocky" priming-based experiment, we find that LMs associate ASCs with meaning, even in semantically nonsensical sentences.Our work offers the first evidence for ASCs in LMs and highlights the potential to devise novel probing methods grounded in psycholinguistic research. Transitive DitransitiveCaused-motion Resultative Throw Anita threw the hammer.Chris threw Linda the pencil.Pat threw the keys onto the roof.Lyn threw the box apart.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.