SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Meta-analytic evidence of depression and anxiety in Eastern Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic
16 references·1 citing·37 second hop
Meta-analytic evidence of depression and anxiety in Eastern Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic (2022)Meta-analytic evidence of depression and …Understanding and Addressing Sources of Anxiety Among Health Care Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020)Understanding and Addressing …The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)The psychological and mental …Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Prevalence of stress, anxiety…Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Prevalence of mental health p…Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Prevalence of depression, anx…Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science (2020)Multidisciplinary research pr…Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review (2020)Impact of COVID-19 pandemic o…Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Updated guidance for trusted …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers (2018)The Mixed Methods Appraisal T…A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2018)A new improved graphical and …Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity (2017)Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 …Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data (2014)Metaprop: a Stata command to …Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the mental health symptoms during the Covid‐19 pandemic in S outheast A sia (2021)A systematic review and meta‐…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress among populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Stress, appraisal, and coping (1985)Stress: Appraisal and Coping (2013)Effects of COVID-19 on College Students’ Mental Health in the United States: Interview Survey Study (2020)The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence (2020)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Anxiety and depression in COVID-19 survivors: Role of inflammatory and clinical predictors (2020)Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China (2020)Mental health consequences during the initial stage of the 2020 Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) in Spain (2020)Sleep problems during the COVID-19 pandemic by population: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances in COVID‐19 patients: a meta‐analysis (2020)The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China (2020)The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns: a review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies and natural experiments (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms during enforced isolation due to COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal observational study (2020)A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 (2021)The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on child and adolescent mental health: systematic review (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health Outcomes in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review (2020)A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being (2021)Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
  • 2019Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions7,170 cited
  • 2020Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science5,715 cited
  • 2020Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review5,198 cited
  • 2018The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers4,688 cited
  • 2020Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis3,616 cited
  • 2020Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis3,559 cited
  • 2014Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data2,136 cited
  • 2020Understanding and Addressing Sources of Anxiety Among Health Care Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic1,954 cited
  • 2017

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity
1,841 cited
  • 2020The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis1,615 cited
  • 2018A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis1,155 cited
  • 2020Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis1,137 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the mental health symptoms during the Covid‐19 pandemic in S outheast A sia71 cited