The Journal of World Intellectual Property

Abstract

Registries of Indigenous knowledge and centralised Indigenous authorities to oversee these have been advanced as mechanisms to prevent the misappropriation of Indigenous knowledge within Western intellectual property (IP) systems.This article critically examines the potential and limitations of such registries and centralised authorities in the context of Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ).Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 12 Māori creators and intermediaries working within the NZ innovation ecosystem, the article explores Māori perspectives on the benefits, risks, and implications of establishing a registry of mātauranga Māori (Māori knowledge) and a centralised authority to govern it.While participants identified possible advantages-including evidentiary functions, support for commercialisation, educational value for third parties, and improved recognition within Western regulatory and IP systems-none viewed registries or centralised authorities as unproblematic.Several participants raised concerns that registries and centralisation are Western constructs that are ill-suited to reflecting either key Māori values and relationships to knowledge, particularly whakapapa (genealogy) and hononga (relationships), or te ao Māori (the Māori worldview).The perception of risks

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 65 citations exist upstream.