‘Lustrum Condere’

R. M. Ogilvie

34 citations0/0 files storedThe Journal of Roman Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Classical Antiquity Studies Biblical Studies and Interpretation Classical Studies and Philology

Abstract

In any reconsideration of the meaning of the phrase ‘lustrum condere’ the first stage must be to decide its approximate antiquity. If it were shown to be an antiquarian imposture, it would have to be regarded in a very different light from a genuine survival of religious language. Three passages are relevant to this first point.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 34 citations exist upstream.

References

1955Rites of the State Religion in Roman Art 1937A history of Roman religion

Cited by

2018NotCensusbutDeductio: Reconsidering the ‘Araof Domitius Ahenobarbus’2017THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE LUPERCALIA 2012EL MITO DE TELEPINU Y EL ALTAR PRIMORDIAL EN FORMA DE PIEL DE TORO

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.