SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Fostering Integrity in Research
0 references·16 citing·48 second hop
Fostering Integrity in Research (2016)Fostering Integrity in ResearchTrends in US public confidence in science and opportunities for progress (2024)Trends in US public confidenc…Researchers on research integrity: a survey of European and American researchers (2023)Researchers on research integ…Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: A scoping review (2022)Factors influencing the promo…Strengthening research integrity: which topic areas should organisations focus on? (2021)Strengthening research integr…Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review (2021)Practices for Research Integr…For the “good of the lab”: Insights from three focus groups concerning the ethics of managing a laboratory or research group (2021)For the “good of the lab”: In…Explanations of Research Misconduct, and How They Hang Together (2021)Explanations of Research Misc…Educating PhD Students in Research Integrity in Europe (2021)Educating PhD Students in Res…Where Is the Provenance? Ethical Replicability and Reproducibility in GIScience and Its Critical Applications (2020)Where Is the Provenance? Ethi…Toward global standardization of conducting fair investigations of allegations of research misconduct (2020)Toward global standardization…Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium (2019)Scientific Integrity Principl…Researchers’ perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam (2019)Researchers’ perceptions of r…Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe (2019)Perceptions of research integ…Computing environments for reproducibility: Capturing the “Whole Tale” (2018)Computing environments for re…Transparency in Authors’ Contributions and Responsibilities to Promote Integrity in Scientific Publication (2017)Transparency in Authors’ Cont…FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH (2017)FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEAR…Authorship! Authorship! (1994)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit (2015)Exploring researchers’ perspectives on authorship decision making (2019)Retraction: The “Other Face” of Research Collaboration? (2020)Research assessments should recognize responsible research practices — Narrative review of a lively debate and promising developments (2021)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)Signaling the trustworthiness of science (2019)Protecting scientific integrity in an age of generative AI (2024)Scientific workflow management and the Kepler system (2005)Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences (2010)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Reproducibility and replicability: opportunities and challenges for geospatial research (2020)Ten simple rules for writing Dockerfiles for reproducible data science (2020)Traceability for Trustworthy AI: A Review of Models and Tools (2021)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices (2020)Socio-technical scales in socio-environmental modeling: Managing a system-of-systems modeling approach (2020)Beyond nutrition and physical activity: food industry shaping of the very principles of scientific integrity (2021)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (1994)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Explaining variance in perceived research misbehavior: results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam (2021)Prevalence of responsible research practices among academics in The Netherlands (2022)The Normative Structure of Science (1973)Qualitative Content Analysis (2014)Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study (2021)Teaching phronesis in a research integrity course (2022)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts (2021)Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions (2023)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity (1994)Fostering a research integrity culture: Actionable advice for institutions (2022)JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020)The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication (2017)Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (2019)From complexity to clarity: How AI enhances perceptions of scientists and the public's understanding of science (2024)The rising danger of AI-generated images in nanomaterials science and what we can do about it (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2019Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium165 cited
  • 2017FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH135 cited
  • 2018Computing environments for reproducibility: Capturing the “Whole Tale”132 cited
  • 2024Trends in US public confidence in science and opportunities for progress73 cited
  • 2021Educating PhD Students in Research Integrity in Europe67 cited
  • 2021Strengthening research integrity: which topic areas should organisations focus on?48 cited
  • 2017Transparency in Authors’ Contributions and Responsibilities to Promote Integrity in Scientific Publication46 cited
  • 2022Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: A scoping review45 cited
  • 2019Researchers’ perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam37 cited
  • 2021Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review37 cited
  • 2020Where Is the Provenance? Ethical Replicability and Reproducibility in GIScience and Its Critical Applications34 cited
  • 2019Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe34 cited
  • 2023

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Researchers on research integrity: a survey of European and American researchers
33 cited
  • 2020Toward global standardization of conducting fair investigations of allegations of research misconduct32 cited
  • 2021Explanations of Research Misconduct, and How They Hang Together32 cited
  • 2021For the “good of the lab”: Insights from three focus groups concerning the ethics of managing a laboratory or research group31 cited