SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Justificationist View of Disagreement's Epistemic Significance
0 references·16 citing·49 second hop
A Justificationist View of Disagreement's Epistemic Significance (2010)A Justificationist View of Disagreement's…Disagreement and alienation (2023)Disagreement and alienationBad Beliefs (2021)Bad BeliefsVirtue signalling is virtuous (2020)Virtue signalling is virtuousHow to endorse conciliationism (2020)How to endorse conciliationismNo-Platforming and Higher-Order Evidence, or Anti-Anti-No-Platforming (2019)No-Platforming and Higher-Ord…Knowing Our Limits (2019)Knowing Our LimitsEpistemic Trespassing (2019)Epistemic TrespassingThe epistemic value of expert autonomy (2018)The epistemic value of expert…The epistemology of moral disagreement (2017)The epistemology of moral dis…DISAGREEMENT, DRUGS, ETC.: FROM ACCURACY TO AKRASIA (2016)DISAGREEMENT, DRUGS, ETC.: FR…THE SIGNIFICANCE OF UNPOSSESSED EVIDENCE (2015)THE SIGNIFICANCE OF UNPOSSESS…Contingency Anxiety and the Epistemology of Disagreement (2015)Contingency Anxiety and the E…Peer Disagreement, Evidence, and Well-Groundedness (2013)Peer Disagreement, Evidence, …From Independence to Conciliationism: An Obituary (2013)From Independence to Concilia…Epistemic Modesty Defended1 (2013)Epistemic Modesty Defended1Confidence, Evidence, and Disagreement (2013)Confidence, Evidence, and Dis…The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement (2005)Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News (2007)Reflection and Disagreement (2007)A Dilemma for Calibrationism (2014)How Doxastic Justification Helps Us Solve the Puzzle of Misleading Higher‐Order Evidence (2016)Formulating Independence (2019)The descent of man and selection in relation to sex (1907)Naming and Necessity (1972)The geography of thought : how Asians and Westerners think differently--and why (2003)Indoctrination anxiety and the etiology of belief (2015)Nietzsche as a Critic of Genealogical Debunking: Making Room for Naturalism without Subversion (2019)Skepticism Motivated: On the Skeptical Import of Motivated Reasoning (2020)Oxford Studies In Epistemology (2007)Explanationism provides the best explanation of the epistemic significance of peer disagreement (2019)Suspension, Higher-Order Evidence, and Defeat (2021)Bias (2022)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Evidence: A Guide for the Uncertain (2019)An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. (1925)Wise Choices, Apt Feelings (1990)Rethinking Expertise (2007)Why Think for Yourself? (2022)Art as a Shelter from Science (2023)Passions within reason: the strategic role of the emotions (1989)Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language (1996)Affect, Not Ideology (2012)“Are they allowed to do that?” Content and typology of corporate socio-political positioning on TWITTER. A study of DAX-30 companies in Germany (2021)The virtuous brand: The perils and promises of brand virtue signaling (2021)Bad language makes good politics (2023)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence (2020)Doing your own research and other impossible acts of epistemic superheroism (2022)Why We Should Be Suspicious of Conspiracy Theories: A Novel Demarcation Problem (2022)Philosophy, Bullshit, and Peer Review (2023)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. (1988)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)What’s wrong with epistemic trespassing? (2021)Citizen Knowledge (2023)Lottocracy (2024)Disagreement as Evidence: The Epistemology of Controversy (2009)Peer Disagreement and Higher‐Order Evidence (2010)Conciliation and Self-incrimination (2014)Disagreement and Public Controversy (2014)RESOLUTE CONCILIATIONISM (2015)Recent work on intellectual humility: A philosopher’s perspective (2021)“Do Your Own Research” (2022)Should epistemology take the zetetic turn? (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2021Bad Beliefs157 cited
  • 2019Knowing Our Limits121 cited
  • 2013Peer Disagreement, Evidence, and Well-Groundedness98 cited
  • 2020Virtue signalling is virtuous96 cited
  • 2016DISAGREEMENT, DRUGS, ETC.: FROM ACCURACY TO AKRASIA94 cited
  • 2013Epistemic Modesty Defended194 cited
  • 2013From Independence to Conciliationism: An Obituary75 cited
  • 2015Contingency Anxiety and the Epistemology of Disagreement73 cited
  • 2019Epistemic Trespassing57 cited
  • 2018The epistemic value of expert autonomy55 cited
  • 2023Disagreement and alienation48 cited
  • 2015THE SIGNIFICANCE OF UNPOSSESSED EVIDENCE47 cited
  • 2019No-Platforming and Higher-Order Evidence, or Anti-Anti-No-Platforming45 cited
  • 2020How to endorse conciliationism44 cited
  • 2017The epistemology of moral disagreement39 cited
  • 2013Confidence, Evidence, and Disagreement35 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work