DSM-III and the politics of truth.

Abstract

Attacks upon and defenses of DSM-III continue to be a popular topic for professional journals. This article argues that traditional and prevalent beliefs about the relationship between science and politics cause many communications about DSM-III to become mired in double-talk, in which disavowal of DSM-III's political aspects often serves to affirm that which is being denied. We look at DSM-III through a conceptual lens in which science and politics are mutually exclusive. Consequently, any mention of the political dimensions of DSM-III may be automatically perceived as an attack upon the scientific integrity of the taxonomy. Integral aspects of science and politics should be acknowledged, and self-defeating dichotomous reasoning about DSM-III's scientific and political dimensions should be avoided.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 51 citations exist upstream.