SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scoping reviews: establishing the role of the librarian
16 references·2 citing·29 second hop
Scoping reviews: establishing the role of the librarian (2017)Scoping reviews: establishing the role of…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products (2016)What is an evidence map? A sy…PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews (2015)The Joanna Briggs Institute r…Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Guidance for conducting syste…Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting (2014)Scoping reviews: time for cla…A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)A scoping review of scoping r…Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review (2013)Systematic Approaches to a Su…Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework (2013)Enhancing the scoping study m…Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature (2009)What are scoping studies? A r…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Synthesising research evidence. (2001)Synthesising research evidenc…Sustainable development practices in healthcare: a systematic review (2025)Sustainable development pract…Evidence-based biomedical research in Sub-Saharan Africa: how library and information science professionals contribute to systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2022)Evidence-based biomedical res…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013 (2014)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,226 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,457 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration3,375 cited
  • 2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,074 cited
  • 2014Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting2,780 cited
  • 2013Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework1,889 cited
  • 2015The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews1,135 cited
  • 2013Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review864 cited
  • 2009What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

854 cited
  • 2016What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products657 cited
  • 2001Synthesising research evidence.439 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Evidence-based biomedical research in Sub-Saharan Africa: how library and information science professionals contribute to systematic reviews and meta-analyses9 cited
    • 2025Sustainable development practices in healthcare: a systematic review4 cited