SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibility
0 references·16 citing·52 second hop
Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibility (2013)Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibil…The MDAR (Materials Design Analysis Reporting) Framework for transparent reporting in the life sciences (2021)The MDAR (Materials Design An…The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods (2020)The Rigor and Transparency In…Limited engagement with transparent and open science standards in the policies of pain journals: a cross-sectional evaluation (2020)Limited engagement with trans…Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature (2020)Comparing quality of reportin…Did a change in Nature journals’ editorial policy for life sciences research improve reporting? (2019)Did a change in Nature journa…A consensus-based transparency checklist (2019)A consensus-based transparenc…Why we need to report more than 'Data were Analyzed by t-tests or ANOVA' (2018)Why we need to report more th…Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility (2016)Tools and techniques for comp…Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement (2015)Risk of Bias in Reports of In…Reproducing Statistical Results (2015)Reproducing Statistical Resul…Significance chasing in research practice: causes, consequences and possible solutions (2014)Significance chasing in resea…Fair game? Producing and publishing gambling research (2014)Fair game? Producing and publ…Big Data, data integrity, and the fracturing of the control zone (2014)Big Data, data integrity, and…Reproducibility: The risks of the replication drive (2013)Reproducibility: The risks of…Reproducibility of research and preclinical validation: problems and solutions (2013)Reproducibility of research a…PsychDisclosure.org (2013)PsychDisclosure.orgPooling of Animal Experimental Data Reveals Influence of Study Design and Publication Bias (2004)Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: A practical guide (2013)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)When Quality Beats Quantity: Decision Theory, Drug Discovery, and the Reproducibility Crisis (2016)Mindfulness mediates the physiological markers of stress: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2017)Yoga, mindfulness-based stress reduction and stress-related physiological measures: A meta-analysis (2017)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Reproducibility and Research Integrity (2016)Enabling precision medicine via standard communication of HTS provenance, analysis, and results (2018)Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The Tacit Dimension (1997)Perceived crisis and reforms: Issues, explanations, and remedies. (2018)The reproducibility of statistical results in psychological research: An investigation using unpublished raw data. (2020)Reproducible Research: A Retrospective (2021)Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. (1959)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Early-Career Researchers’ Perceptions of the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices, Potential Causes, and Open Science (2017)Examining Psychological Science Through Systematic Meta-Method Analysis: A Call for Research (2019)A Practical Guide to Registered Reports for Economists (2022)Design of Experiments (1936)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments (1989)Reproducible and replicable pain research: a critical review (2018)Recommendations to enhance rigor and reproducibility in biomedical research (2020)EntropyHub: An open-source toolkit for entropic time series analysis (2021)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Pravila PRISMA 2020. (2021)Video game play is positively correlated with well-being (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Automated screening of COVID-19 preprints: can we help authors to improve transparency and reproducibility? (2021)Changes in Research Ethics, Openness, and Transparency in Empirical Studies between CHI 2017 and CHI 2022 (2023)Preregistration in practice: A comparison of preregistered and non-preregistered studies in psychology (2023)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers (2019)Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting (2020)Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic (2022)Bringing the Gold Standard into the Classroom: Replication in University Teaching (2015)Reproducibility of science: Fraud, impact factors and carelessness (2017)The limits of replicability (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2015Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement358 cited
  • 2016Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility169 cited
  • 2019A consensus-based transparency checklist151 cited
  • 2020Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature146 cited
  • 2013PsychDisclosure.org103 cited
  • 2013Reproducibility of research and preclinical validation: problems and solutions102 cited
  • 2019Did a change in Nature journals’ editorial policy for life sciences research improve reporting?101 cited
  • 2013Reproducibility: The risks of the replication drive99 cited
  • 2020The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods88 cited
  • 2015Reproducing Statistical Results78 cited
  • 2021The MDAR (Materials Design Analysis Reporting) Framework for transparent reporting in the life sciences77 cited
  • 2018Why we need to report more than 'Data were Analyzed by t-tests or ANOVA'76 cited
  • 2014Big Data, data integrity, and the fracturing of the control zone75 cited
  • 2014Fair game? Producing and publishing gambling research67 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2014Significance chasing in research practice: causes, consequences and possible solutions60 cited
  • 2020Limited engagement with transparent and open science standards in the policies of pain journals: a cross-sectional evaluation52 cited