SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials
1 references·12 citing·43 second hop
Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)Comparison of protocols and registry entr…Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)Comparison of protocols and r…Identifying evidence for five realist reviews in primary health care: A comparison of search methods (2021)Identifying evidence for five…Discrepancies from registered protocols and spin occurred frequently in randomized psychotherapy trials—A meta-epidemiologic study (2020)Discrepancies from registered…From registration to publication: A study on Dutch academic randomized controlled trials (2019)From registration to publicat…Evaluation of Journal Registration Policies and Prospective Registration of Randomized Clinical Trials of Nonregulated Health Care Interventions (2019)Evaluation of Journal Registr…COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchers’ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials (2019)COMPare: Qualitative analysis…Registered trials report less beneficial treatment effects than unregistered ones: a meta-epidemiological study in orthodontics (2018)Registered trials report less…Making protocols available with the article improved evaluation of selective outcome reporting (2018)Making protocols available wi…The heart of the matter: Outcome reporting bias and registration status in cardio-thoracic surgery (2016)The heart of the matter: Outc…Methodological review: quality of randomized controlled trials in health literacy (2016)Methodological review: qualit…Transparency of outcome reporting and trial registration of randomized controlled trials in top psychosomatic and behavioral health journals: A 5-year follow-up (2015)Transparency of outcome repor…Protocol registration and selective outcome reporting in recent psychiatry trials: new antidepressants and cognitive behavioural therapies (2015)Protocol registration and sel…Cohort study of trials submitted to ethics committee identified discrepant reporting of outcomes in publications (2013)Cohort study of trials submit…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Evaluation of selective outcome reporting and trial registration practices among addiction clinical trials (2019)Neurodivergence, intersectionality, and eating disorders: a lived experience-led narrative review (2024)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established (2017)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Statistical controversies in clinical research: comparison of primary outcomes in protocols, public clinical-trial registries and publications: the example of oncology trials (2016)Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses (2021)Time to publication for results of clinical trials (2024)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Publication bias: what is it? How do we measure it? How do we avoid it? (2013)The study design elements employed by researchers in preclinical animal experiments from two research domains and implications for automation of systematic reviews (2018)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Does Mindfulness Meditation Training Enhance Executive Control? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Adults (2019)Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture (2019)Study Preregistration: An Evaluation of a Method for Transparent Reporting (2020)Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review (2015)Inadequate description of placebo and sham controls in a systematic review of recent trials (2019)Writing up your clinical trial report for a scientific journal: the REPORT trial guide for effective and transparent research reporting without spin (2022)Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses (2023)Assessing the feasibility and impact of clinical trial trustworthiness checks via an application to Cochrane Reviews: Stage 2 of the INSPECT-SR project (2025)Projections of Global Mortality and Burden of Disease from 2002 to 2030 (2006)La Intervención Relacional Basada en el Apego (IRBA) en formato virtual. Un estudio exploratorio con primera infancia (2021)Improving parenting, child attachment, and externalizing behaviors: Meta-analysis of the first 25 randomized controlled trials on the effects of Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (2022)Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources (2005)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)A Tailored Approach: A model for literature searching in complex systematic reviews (2022)Coaching into wellbeing: A realist review of cognitive behavioral coaching interventions in the workplace (2025)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Empirically supported treatment: Recommendations for a new model. (2015)Registration of randomized controlled trials in nursing journals (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials243 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Registered trials report less beneficial treatment effects than unregistered ones: a meta-epidemiological study in orthodontics34 cited
  • 2019Evaluation of Journal Registration Policies and Prospective Registration of Randomized Clinical Trials of Nonregulated Health Care Interventions34 cited
  • 2013Cohort study of trials submitted to ethics committee identified discrepant reporting of outcomes in publications32 cited
  • 2015Protocol registration and selective outcome reporting in recent psychiatry trials: new antidepressants and cognitive behavioural therapies29 cited
  • 2020Discrepancies from registered protocols and spin occurred frequently in randomized psychotherapy trials—A meta-epidemiologic study28 cited
  • 2015Transparency of outcome reporting and trial registration of randomized controlled trials in top psychosomatic and behavioral health journals: A 5-year follow-up28 cited
  • 2019COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchers’ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials27 cited
  • 2016Methodological review: quality of randomized controlled trials in health literacy25 cited
  • 2021Identifying evidence for five realist reviews in primary health care: A comparison of search methods23 cited
  • 2019From registration to publication: A study on Dutch academic randomized controlled trials21 cited
  • 2018Making protocols available with the article improved evaluation of selective outcome reporting

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

20 cited
  • 2016The heart of the matter: Outcome reporting bias and registration status in cardio-thoracic surgery10 cited