The New Statistics for Better Science: Ask How Much, How Uncertain, and What Else is Known

Robert J Calin-Jageman · Geoff Cumming

8 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Academic Publishing and Open Access Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Abstract

&&& Now published in the American Statistician: https://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00031305.2018.1518266 *** The "New Statistics" emphasizes effect sizes, confidence intervals, meta-analysis and the use of Open Science practices. We present 3 specific ways in which a New Statistics approach can help improve scientific practice: by reducing over-confidence in small samples, by reducing confirmation bias, and by fostering more cautious judgements of consistency.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience 2005Oxytocin increases trust in humans 1971Belief in the law of small numbers.2011Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association 2017Redefine statistical significance 2015Promoting an open research culture 2011Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis 1959Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.